<?xml version="1.0"  encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bind-users Mailing List Threads</title>
<link>http://readlist.com</link>
<description>Bind-users Mailing List - New Threads feed</description>
<language>en</language>

<item>
  <title>TXT records in reverse domains</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9071.html</link>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 18:28:47 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Is there any issue with putting TXT records in reverse domains? I want to put some TXT records in the same domain as some of my PTR records to give additional information on the hosts in that domain. I've looked in the DNS &amp; BIND book and online, but I didn't see any explicit statements that disallow it. However, I didn't see any explicit statements that allow it, either. All of the examples for TXT records I have seen have been on the ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>ignoring out-of-zone msg after nsupdate</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9068.html</link>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 17:31:27 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hello , I'm having a problem with bind-9.4.2-3 as well as in bind-9.3.3-10.el5. The sequence that leads to the error is 1) Start up the nameserver. 2) Do nsupdate to change the zone info, In this change the ips of several A records 3) At this point i see that there are .jnl files written with the same name as the zone conf files 4) Stop the nameserver 5) Start the nameserver. ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>transfers to blank slave</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9066.html</link>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:57:07 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>I am apologizing ahead of time because I am sure this has been asked a lot but I am having trouble finding similar terminology for my searching. Is there any way to get around having to populate the slave with a zone entry for transfers? Thanks! ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Reverse DNS Scenario</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9058.html</link>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:04:29 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Dear All, I have a mail server hosted in the Amazon ec2 environment. The mails are being rejected from few servers as the reverse lookup points to amazon hostname rather than my domain name. Is it possible to install a dns server on the mail server box and do a reverse lookup. Or is there a third party who does the same as amazon is not ready to put in a reverse lookup. Regards Sumit Kumar ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Bind 9.4.2 and unit5.org</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9054.html</link>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:15:23 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hello, I have an interesting issue and I am hoping someone can explain to me why BIND is behaving the way it is. There is a domain unit5.org with two NS according to WHOIS From WHOIS: Name Server:NS.UNIT5.ORG Name Server:NS2.UNIT5.ORG    Domain servers in listed order:    NS.UNIT5.ORG                 207.63.250.13    NS2.UNIT5.ORG                207.63.250.12 One NS is NOT responsive = ns2.unit5.org Shouldn't the other ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Server ignore ns change</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9045.html</link>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:08:50 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hi. We recently introducted two new dns server in our networks removing our old ones from the DHCP. I've updated the servers which had resolv.conf statically. Even though all servers is updated I'm still getting most requests to my old servers. If I do a dig the new servers answers. What could the reason for this be? Thanks /Jonathan ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>A SOA Problem</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9041.html</link>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>hi,all I have a SOA problem resolving a domain name. [root@redhat ~]# dig @202.96.209.5 sonystyle.com.cn +trace ; &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; DiG 9.2.4 &lt;&lt;&gt;&gt; @202.96.209.5 sonystyle.com.cn +trace ;; global options: printcmd . 444044 IN NS g.root-servers.net. . 444044 IN NS h.root-servers.net. . 444044 IN NS ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Nicht erreichbar bis 26.5.08 / Out of Office until 26/5/08</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9040.html</link>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:10:17 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Ich werde ab 10.05.2008 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 26.05.2008. --- Danke für Ihre E-Mail-Nachricht. Ich bin bis 26. Mai 2008 nicht im Büro. In dringenden Angelegenheiten kontaktieren Sie bitte DENICoperations (Email: ops, Tel: (069) 27235-272). --- Thank you for your email message. I am not in the office until 26 May 2008. In urgent cases please contact DENICoperations (Email: ops, Tel: +49 69 27235 ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Impact of SRV records on DNS performance</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9037.html</link>
  <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:02:42 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hi All, I would like to know if there is any impact on DNS performance if I use SRV records. My DNS box runs Solaris 10 and Bind version 9.3.4.P1. Regards, Hossein Ahmadi 908-370-2782 The information contained in this message and any attachment may be proprietary, confidential, and privileged or subject to the work product doctrine and thus protected from disclosure. If the reader of this ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>One bind instance to handle faked root and caching-only name server possible?</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9035.html</link>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:13:13 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hi All, I am trying to have a setup to meet the following need: 1) if the query sources are from network 10.10.10.0/24, the query will be handled by a caching-only name server, query will be forwarded to legitimate name server for resolution if there is cache miss. 2) if the query sources are from network 10.10.20.0/24, no matter what the query is, the named server will return one fixed IP address for example 192.168.1.1. Basically, this ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Managing an Internet outage</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9022.html</link>
  <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 19:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>We occasionally have a situation where our Internet access is completely down. My Manager has asked about the viability of locating a DNS server off site, and during a situation when we're down, modifying it so that it resolves my entire domain to a single IP address. Web users would be redirected to that address, and a web page would explain we're off line. Our DNS TTL is set to 1 hour, however, I'm concerned that sites might ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>WPAD / PAC woes</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9018.html</link>
  <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 10:35:26 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hi Im really stumped on this one. Im trying to get WPAD working, but Mozilla Firefox is not playing game. IE is working. If anyone could help, it would be great. Heres my apache virtual host ------------------------------------------ &lt;VirtualHost *:80&gt; ServerAdmin webmaster ServerAlias wpad.example.local ServerName wpad.example.local DocumentRoot /var/www/wpad/ ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>dnssec-keygen: a key with algorithm 'HMAC-MD5' cannot be a zone key</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9015.html</link>
  <pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 23:09:57 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>I used to successfully generate keys when I have BIND 9.2 installed on my host using the following commandline # dnssec-keygen -a HMAC-MD5 -b 128 -n ZONE mykey-otherkey I upgraded my host to with BIND 9.3 and used the same command line above to get the following error: # dnssec-keygen -a HMAC-MD5 -b 128 -n ZONE mykey-otherkey dnssec-keygen: a key with algorithm 'HMAC-MD5' cannot be a zone key What ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Resolution Check</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9008.html</link>
  <pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 16:01:54 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Can someone in Europe, or more specifically Germany tell me if they are able to resolve asp-eurekanet.com? I am having an issue resolving it from some name servers in a data center in Germany. But its resolving fine from my office here in the US. Thank you, -- Josh Smith email/jabber: juicewvu phone: 304.237.9369(c) () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>BIND can't resolve with unreachable second NS</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/9007.html</link>
  <pubDate>Thu, 8 May 2008 14:21:43 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>A puzzle... Solaris 10, BIND 9.4.2. We've been having a problem resolving a web site name. Trying to resolve www.childcaremanager.com. Turns out that is a CNAME to childcaremanager.com. THAT domain claims to have 2 dns servers: ns1.ccmturbo.com at 69.9.147.35 and ns2.ccmturbo.com at 69.9.147.36 But... two interesting things. From a different network I can find that ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>special features</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/8990.html</link>
  <pubDate>Wed, 7 May 2008 14:33:28 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hi all, I am very new to DNS and I would like to know if the 2 following features exist (or at least are implementable): 1- non complete domain hosting. I would like the BIND server to be able to resolve IP addresses for server1.mydomain.com and server2.mydomain.com, but leave all hostnames *.mydomain.com resolved by one of the Master DNS servers. 2- Spoof of Name error response with a static IP address, in order to better ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Modifying BIND to provide requesting IP address to sdb API</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/8985.html</link>
  <pubDate>Wed, 7 May 2008 05:20:05 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>I've written a custom SDB driver for BIND that interacts with a Python system I've already written. The only problem is that my SDB driver lookup function needs access to the requesting client's IP address (the IP address of the machine that originated the DNS query), not just the zone and hostname to resolve. I know that BIND has this information at some point, but then must not pass it into the sdb API. Are there any BIND developers lurking ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Setting up my MX's records to redirect mail from source domain.</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/8975.html</link>
  <pubDate>Tue, 6 May 2008 23:51:55 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hi, I'm running bind on a Linux server and I want to configure the MX's records to do this below: All mail from *.mydomain ----&gt; redirect to MX1, MX2 and MX3 and All other mail *.* ----&gt; redirect to MX4, MX5 and MX6 Can you help me? Thanks in advance. Regards, Victoria --------------------------------- Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Multiple SOA records?</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/8968.html</link>
  <pubDate>Tue, 6 May 2008 20:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>RFC 1935 says: 2. Exactly one SOA RR should be present at the top of the zone. Note: "should", not "must". What kind of consequences can I expect trying to resolve records in a domain that has more than one SOA? The domain that is making problems is traininghott.com. Querying for its SOAs returns SERVFAIL, but querying the domain's name servers directly returns two (different) SOAs. This appears to create ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Bind and OpenLDAP</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/isc.org/bind-users/1/8967.html</link>
  <pubDate>Tue, 6 May 2008 20:32:04 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hi all, I need some explanation and someone who can check if my named.conf is correct. What needs to be explained is the database line, of course. The part after ldap://localhost/ou=DNS,ou=Computers,dc=example,dc=com is a bit strange to me. As far as I know this isn't standard LDAP, so what does it mean and is what I have created correct? TIA, Arjan. options { directory ...</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
