<?xml version="1.0"  encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gcc Mailing List Threads</title>
<link>http://readlist.com</link>
<description>Gcc Mailing List - New Threads feed</description>
<language>en</language>

<item>
  <title>gcc-4.3-20080515 is now available</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21514.html</link>
  <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 22:46:18 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Snapshot gcc-4.3-20080515 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.3-20080515/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.3 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_3-branch revision 135399 You'll find: gcc-4.3-20080515.tar.bz2 Complete GCC (includes all of below) ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>gcc-4.2-20080514 is now available</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21504.html</link>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:44:35 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Snapshot gcc-4.2-20080514 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2-20080514/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.2 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_2-branch revision 135313 You'll find: gcc-4.2-20080514.tar.bz2 Complete GCC (includes all of below) ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>GCC 4.1.2 Port - Is live analysis going wrong?</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21501.html</link>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:44:26 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hello all, In the gcc 4.1.2 port i am working on, i get an ICE in insert_save, at caller-save.c:725 And following is the assert that assert failure. /* A common failure mode if register status is not correct in the RTL is for this routine to be called with a REGNO we didn't expect to save. That will cause us to write an insn with a (nil) SET_DEST or SET_SRC. Instead of doing so and causing a crash ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>gcc 4.3.0 build; I built the g++ compiler, but there are no header files and no C++ libraries</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21499.html</link>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:50:46 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hello: I wrote to the help gcc site and got no response, so I am writing here. Help would be immensely appreciated. I am trying to build GCC 4.3.0. I built GMP 4.2.2 and MPFR 2.3.1, and then I built GCC 4.3.0. Everything appeared to go fine. I installed compilers for C, C++, and Fortran. To configure, I did: ../src-gcc-4.3.0/gcc-4.3.0/configure --prefix=/home/simsci1/share/gcc-4.3.0/ ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Supporting an instruction in the back-end - II</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21496.html</link>
  <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:49:30 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hello all, Will it be possible to write a pattern in the md file to support setting/clearing a bit of a particular register? The instructions are as follows: clrb Rx, bitNo setb Rx, bitNo Could you point me to the back-ends that has support for this kind of instructions? Thanks for your time. Regards, Shafi. ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>h8/300 build failure</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21490.html</link>
  <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 18:43:12 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Anyone else seeing this on trunk? 	if test -z "$objects"; then				\ 	 echo 'int __libgcc_eh_dummy;' &gt; eh_dummy.c;		\ 	 /sata/dj/gnu/newlib/h8300-elf/./gcc/xgcc -B/sata/dj/gnu/newlib/h8300-elf/./gcc/ -B/sata/dj/gnu/install/h8300-elf/bin/ -B/sata/dj/gnu/install/h8300-elf/lib/ -isystem /sata/dj/gnu/install/h8300-elf/include -isystem /sata/dj/gnu/install/h8300-elf/sys-include -g -O2 -O2 -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>gcc-get enabling-only subscription?</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21482.html</link>
  <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:04:53 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>With my current email setup and the volume of the gcc mailing list, it is not desirable to be to be subscribed to the gcc mailing list, I rather read the web archives. However, this does not allow to make a properly threaded reply. I've tried to use gcc-get email interface, but apparently it will only send to subscribers. Is there a way to subscribe only for the purpose of being able to receive messages with the gcc-get mechanism, without ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Reviving old port</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21479.html</link>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 23:38:30 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hi All, BACKGROUND: Downloaded the source code of the Xemics CoolRISC gcc port from Raisonance's website (ftp://www.raisonance.com/pub/CoolRISC/cool3_2.zip). I concluded that the port is based in gcc 3.2 from looking at the NEWS file in the gcc folder. I what to bring to this gcc port up to the latest version of gcc. The motivations for doing this are: 1- Gain experience on how to port gcc. This will be useful in ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>gcc-4.1-20080512 is now available</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21478.html</link>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:43:18 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Snapshot gcc-4.1-20080512 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20080512/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_1-branch revision 135235 You'll find: gcc-4.1-20080512.tar.bz2 Complete GCC (includes all of below) ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>GCC 4.2.4 Status Report (2008-05-12)</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21477.html</link>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 22:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Status ====== GCC 4.2.4-rc1 is now available from &lt;ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.2.4-RC-20080512/&gt;. All commits to the GCC 4.2 branch need to be approved by a release manager until GCC 4.2.4 is released. All fixes going on that branch should first have gone on trunk and 4.3 branch. GCC 4.2.4 will follow in about a week in the absence of any significant problems with 4.2.4-rc1. If you believe a problem ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>[lto] Merged trunk @135136</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21473.html</link>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:55:12 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>There were a couple of fixes needed due to the SFT removal. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64. 2008-05-12 Diego Novillo &lt;dnovillo&gt; Mainline merge @135136 * configure.ac (ACX_PKGVERSION): Update revision merge string. * configure: Regenerate. 2008-05-12 Diego Novillo &lt;dnovillo&gt; * lto-tree-flags.def (STRUCT_FIELD_TAG): Remove. * treestruct.def ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>[tuples] Merged with trunk @135126</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21472.html</link>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>This merge brought quite a few conflicts because of recent changes in trunk to SFTs and other middle-end changes. Bootstrapped and tested x86_64. Diego. ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>IRA performance testing on Fortran</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21463.html</link>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:10:42 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Here is my report on Fortran benchmarking. I compare the trunk dated 20080507 (no revision number, sorry) and the IRA branch rev. 135035. I run the Polyhedron benchmark (http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/polyhedron_benchmark_suite0html) which is probably the most widely used benchmark in the Fortran community. I don't have many points, but they're very well converged (the "standard" parameters were used, which means each test and each set of ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>bit_size_type - a data type?</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21455.html</link>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hello all, During debugging in gimple dumps i found a term that is used along with other data types - bit_size_type. I am getting ICEs when size of int is 32 bit and no errors when the size of int is 16. This is for a back-end whose native size is 16bit. Is this any internal data type used to for representation? What is the size of this data type? Will i be able to control the size of this like we can for other data ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>About symbol and label</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21453.html</link>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 06:13:44 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>hello, all. Now I am working on porting gcc to a new RISC processor. There are to two concept confused me: symbol and label. They are both important in generating assemble. Like a variable name : int g_iarray[10], and a function name: int fun1(int i, int j) and internal jump labels like L1, L2. which are labels and which are symbols. Thank you very much. ___________________________________________________________ ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>[Windows] Fixing fprintf errors breaking bootstrap?</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21449.html</link>
  <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 21:29:47 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>I am still seeing errors such as this bootstrapping trunk with -Werror. I thought all of this was supposed to be resolved? ../../svn/gcc/bt-load.c: In function 'migrate_btr_defs': ../../svn/gcc/bt-load.c:1415: error: ISO C does not support the 'I64' ms_printf length modifier What needs to be fixed here? Does HOST_WIDEST_INT_PRINT_DEC need to change, or something else? ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>inline assembly question (memory side-effects)</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21448.html</link>
  <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:52:48 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Hi. What is the proper way to tell gcc that a inline assembly statement either modifies a particular area of memory or needs it to be updated/in-sync because the assembly reads from it. E.g., assume I have a struct blah { int sum; ... }; which is accessed by my assembly code. int my_chksum(struct blah *blah_p) { blah_p-&gt;sum = 0; /* assembly code computes ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>How do I add target specific tests?</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21445.html</link>
  <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 13:07:51 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>I want to add target specific tests for AVR. These would be testcases for PR that fail related to AVR back end problems - rather than testcases for generic PR. Do I just add them to directory testsuite/gcc.target/avr? Or are there some other configuration steps needed? Andy ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>Deprecation?!</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21440.html</link>
  <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 02:05:52 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>I'm getting a " warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to ‘char*’" message in g++ (GCC) 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7). I've always understood there is no such thing as deprecation in C++ (and have been proud of this concept). What gives? Does the standards committee allow deprecation - have I been wrong all along - or is the Ubuntu team trying way too hard to be like Microsoft (who declares deprecations in their latest ...</description>
</item>
<item>
  <title>gcc-4.4-20080509 is now available</title>
  <link>http://readlist.com/lists/gcc.gnu.org/gcc/4/21438.html</link>
  <pubDate>Fri, 9 May 2008 22:49:50 GMT</pubDate>
  <description>Snapshot gcc-4.4-20080509 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.4-20080509/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.4 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision 135128 You'll find: gcc-4.4-20080509.tar.bz2 Complete GCC (includes all of below) ...</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
