Re: Milter Suggestions - ReadList.com

8 msg	header check question
12 msg	verify parameters
4 msg	Configure postfix in big env
2 msg	envelope sender '<>' via uucp gets rewrit...
2 msg	Spam filtering only for specific email accounts
3 msg	Postfix 2.4 to 2.5: smtp(d)_tls_session_cache_d...
12 msg	Question about 'standards' WRT BATV and SAV
7 msg	my solution to fight backscatter email
2 msg	AUTO: Joe Grastara is out of the office (return...
12 msg	Q about sender_dependent_relayhost_maps inbound...

Milter Suggestions
\ Kirk Bocek (8 May 2008)
. \ (Wietse Venema) (8 May 2008)
. . \ Kirk Bocek (8 May 2008)
. . . \ Victor Duchovni (8 May 2008)
. . . \ (Wietse Venema) (8 May 2008)
. \ Bill Cole (8 May 2008)
. . \ Kirk Bocek (8 May 2008)
. . . \ mouss (8 May 2008)
. . . . \ Kirk Bocek (8 May 2008)
. . . . . \ mouss (8 May 2008)
. . . . \ Kirk Bocek (9 May 2008)
. . . . . \ mouss (9 May 2008)
. . . . . . \ Noel Jones (9 May 2008)
. . . . . . . \ Kirk Bocek (9 May 2008)
. . . . . . \ Kirk Bocek (9 May 2008)
. \ Kirk Bocek (8 May 2008)

9 msg	Transport table and postmap
3 msg	Archiving e-mail?
8 msg	Error 550: unable to relay
1 msg	FW: new subject
13 msg	TLS handshake error
6 msg	Seperating SMTP and POP/IMAP services
3 msg	Test 2
1 msg	Testing
12 msg	[Fwd: ldap users & aliases config]

Subject:	Re: Milter Suggestions
Group:	Postfix-users
From:	Kirk Bocek
Date:	9 May 2008

Noel Jones wrote:
> mouss wrote:
>> Kirk Bocek wrote:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>>> The Reply-To header is addressed back to the alias. Yes, I am
>>> familiar with
>>> all the arguments *against* this behavior. However, this is a private
>>> alias
>>> for some of my friends and it's worked really well for the year or so
>>> we've
>>> been doing it.
>>
>> are you sure you can't get the same feature with canonical?
>>
>
> Or if it's static information (sender X should always have reply-to of
> Y), a check_sender_access map would do... something like:
>
> alias PREPEND Reply-to: <foo>

Between you and mouss, sounds like address manipulation is not an issue here.
However I still need to find a way to manipulate message *bodies*.

Thanks,
Kirk Bocek