| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
> Kirk Bocek wrote: >> >> [snip] >> The Reply-To header is addressed back to the alias. Yes, I am familiar >> with >> all the arguments *against* this behavior. However, this is a private >> alias >> for some of my friends and it's worked really well for the year or so >> we've >> been doing it. > > are you sure you can't get the same feature with canonical? > Or if it's static information (sender X should always have reply-to of Y), a check_sender_access map would do... something like: alias PREPEND Reply-to: <foo> -- Noel Jones
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com