10 msgheader check question

verify parameters
\ egoitz (9 May 2008)
. \ Matthias Haegele (9 May 2008)
. \ (Wietse Venema) (9 May 2008)
. . \ egoitz (9 May 2008)
. \ egoitz (9 May 2008)
. . \ (Wietse Venema) (9 May 2008)
. . . \ egoitz (10 May 2008)
. . . . \ (Wietse Venema) (10 May 2008)
. . . . . \ Terry Carmen (10 May 2008)
. . . . . \ egoitz (11 May 2008)
. . . . . . \ egoitz (11 May 2008)
. . . . . . \ (Wietse Venema) (11 May 2008)

4 msgConfigure postfix in big env
2 msgenvelope sender '<>' via uucp gets rewrit...
2 msgSpam filtering only for specific email accounts
3 msgPostfix 2.4 to 2.5: smtp(d)_tls_session_cache_d...
15 msgQuestion about 'standards' WRT BATV and SAV
7 msgmy solution to fight backscatter email
2 msgAUTO: Joe Grastara is out of the office (return...
12 msgQ about sender_dependent_relayhost_maps inbound...
16 msgMilter Suggestions
9 msgTransport table and postmap
3 msgArchiving e-mail?
8 msgError 550: unable to relay
1 msgFW: new subject
13 msgTLS handshake error
6 msgSeperating SMTP and POP/IMAP services
3 msgTest 2
1 msgTesting
12 msg[Fwd: ldap users & aliases config]
Subject:verify parameters
Group:Postfix-users
From:egoitz
Date:9 May 2008


 
Hi,

I'm using a postfix mail scanning machine for doing relay to another
server wich stores user mailboxes and has his own smtp (a cpanel machine).

Like domain admins could create or delete mail accounts I have enabled in
my postfix scanning machine reject_unverified_recipient. Have done some
checks and have this settings in main.cf file:

address_verify_positive_refresh_time = 3m
address_verify_positive_expire_time = 8m
address_verify_negative_refresh_time = 5m
address_verify_negative_expire_time = 10m


Have done this test :

create a mail account, send a mail to him through postfix (so it should be
positive cached) later remove the mail account (so waiting supposed 3 m it
should be negatively cached) that didn't occur and had to wait more or
less 20 minutes for it be negatively cached... after that I created it and
more or less in 5 minutes it was positively cached again...

so is there any minimum time for positive caching??? the main.cf
explanation of postfix.org (http://www.postfix.org/postconf) doesn't
explain something about minimum values? do they exist??

Why is not this advised for high traffic sites (as said in man pages)? I
think this is an ideal solution for scanning machines in ISP's in wich you
can't know wich recipients are in the other place...



© 2004-2008 readlist.com