4 msgRewriting To: field for outbound messages
13 msgMy server send e-mails that are considered SPAM

Web Based Front End - Update
\ Ronald MacDonald (29 Mar 2008)
. \ Victoriano Giralt (29 Mar 2008)
. . \ Ronald MacDonald (29 Mar 2008)
. \ Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães (29 Mar 2008)
. . \ tepertyu (30 Mar 2008)
. \ Ronald MacDonald (30 Mar 2008)

2 msgmailman subdomain not recognized by some mail s...
14 msgTrying to feed an script with an email
5 msgQ: smtpd_recipient_restrictions w/reject_unlist...
2 msgQuestion about recipient canonical rewrite and ...
3 msgQQ regarding server performance impact when doi...
1 msgRe: qshape and greylisting
4 msgAddress Verification Question
8 msgDistributed mailbombing on one address
2 msgTrouble with postmaster alias
5 msgParent domains confusion?
2 msgAnti-virus scanning with Postfix & Mac OS X
2 msgFolder Structure help
8 msgqmgr_active_corrupt
3 msgretiring a mail server
2 msgSMTP verification
9 msgMultiple IPs
2 msgControlling out going messages
Subject:Web Based Front End - Update
Group:Postfix-users
From:Ronald MacDonald
Date:29 Mar 2008


 
Hi List,

I've been using Postfix+MySQL setup for some years now, and I'm having
a look at the moment at some alternatives to my current set-up.

In the past while, I've added AMaViS, Clamd, SpamAssassin, policyd,
saslauthd, majordomo and all sorts of other things into the mix. Based
on UNIX's failsafe 'one application does one task' philosophy, I've
stuck with Postfix.Admin to do all the mailbox administration, and
other front ends for any other jobs. I don't want an 'one size fits
all' program that tries to do everything, and am happy.

I've been having a look at two alternates to my current solution, and
one of them I've decided to ask here about - regarding the use of LDAP
on the mail system. There's hundreds of pages of 'how to' set up LDAP+
Postfix [that's no problem], but no say on the real benefits of doing
so. I've personally had problems in the past with LDAP, it being
seemingly clumsier than MySQL to do the jobs on the server - but that
might just be me.

I'll be moving to a quicker server at the end of the month, so would
be glad to know people's take on LDAP. Aside from it being more
centralised than having a load of SQL tables doing their different
jobs, so does it compare in terms of, say, scalability?

Sorry for the long post!

Ronald.

--
Ronald MacDonald
http://www.rmacd.com/
0777 235 1655


© 2004-2008 readlist.com