| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
> Duane Hill wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:36:00 +0000 >> Duane Hill <d.hill> wrote: >> >> >>> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:47:54 -0500 >>> Victor Duchovni <Victor.Duchovni> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Jan 24 03:03:46 smtpgate postfix/smtpd[60887]: NOQUEUE: reject: >>>>> RCPT from vds-dacp2.vispnoc.net[209.163.188.148]: 550 5.1.1 >>>>> <7corkeys>: Recipient address rejected: >>>>> undeliverable address: host 162.42.148.120[162.42.148.120] said: >>>>> 550 7corkeys unknown user account (in reply >>>>> to RCPT TO command); from=<shannon> >>>>> to=<7corkeys> proto=ESMTP >>>>> helo=<vds-dacp2.vispnoc.net> >>>>> >>>> The host 162.42.148.120, which does not appear to be running >>>> Postfix, rejected this recipient. The string "unknown user account" >>>> does not appear in the Postfix source code, the response lacks DSN >>>> information and does not enclose the recipient address in <>. >>>> >>>> To find the reason, debug the non-Postfix software running on >>>> 162.42.148.120. >>>> >> >> I just checked the logs on the .120 server and there is no log of a >> connection. If a connection was attempted, it would have been >> logged. Would it be possible if the connection timed out it would be >> considered a failed attempt to verify the account thus rejected as >> unknown account? >> > > the postfix log contains > host 162.42.148.120[162.42.148.120] said: > > so postfix connected to some .120 IP and got a reject "... unknown user > account ...". > > if you have a load balancer or so, or if IPs were reassigned, ... you > may need to check other machines. or if the remote machine doesn't have > the same date/time, check other log files. > > Since address verification results are cached, the probe may have been sent earlier when the recipient was first seen. -- Noel Jones
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com