header and body check exemptions

2 msg	Postfix SASL Help
6 msg	Slowing down postfix
2 msg	need help deciphering a line
4 msg	Postfix SMTP server: errors from something.net[...
4 msg	2.5.0-RC and 2.6 should recognize FreeBSD 8
9 msg	Postfix not following my access file.
3 msg	postfix logs delay, delays, dsn
3 msg	Best way to shutdown postfix prior to servicing...
1 msg	the bounce process hangs a mail (?)
3 msg	messages destined for content_filter stuck in d...
2 msg	Domain in username
5 msg	missing authentication on recipient
5 msg	postfixadmin
5 msg	check_policy_service before reject_rbl_client
9 msg	MXBackup via LDAP

header and body check exemptions
\ Guy Story KC5GOI (21 Jan 2008)
. \ Victor Duchovni (21 Jan 2008)
. \ Noel Jones (21 Jan 2008)
. . \ Guy Story KC5GOI (21 Jan 2008)
. . . \ mouss (21 Jan 2008)

5 msg	Relay recipient maps and relocated users
4 msg	mail forwarding loop :: SPAM
3 msg	transport_maps how to match mx's
2 msg	Where/when to insert a missing Message-ID

Subject:	header and body check exemptions
Group:	Postfix-users
From:	Guy Story KC5GOI
Date:	21 Jan 2008

I need to see if I can create exemptions for specific email addresses in
the body checks and header checks files. I understand that these
entries must be at the start of the list for them to be successful.

In header checks will

/^To|From:user/ HOLD

send messages for that account directly to the hold queue?

I am not sure about how to do this for body checks. The way I read it,
such an entry as I listed for header checks will not work in body checks
since this is checking the body and not the header to see if it is
exempt. For example /user/ OK will not do anything for me
unless /user/ is in the body and only then will that be
passed on.

Chapter 11 of the Postfix The Definitive Guide has some suggestions for
smtpd_restriction_classes, it addresses things like
reject_invalid_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_hostname, etc. Can this be
used to run two different sets of body and header checks? The way I
read it, this only applies to smtpd restrictions.

I suspect the header check is the source of the complaint from our
marketing department.

Guy

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

begin:vcard
fn:Guy Story
n:Story;Guy
org:Texas Hematology Oncology/PCCC;IT
adr:;;4352 North Josey Lane;Carrollton;Tx;75010;USA
email;internet:gstory
title:MIS Manager
tel;work:214.483.5900
tel;fax:972.394.0680
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.pccctx.com
version:2.1
end:vcard