2 msgPostfix SASL Help
6 msgSlowing down postfix
2 msgneed help deciphering a line
4 msgPostfix SMTP server: errors from something.net[...
4 msg2.5.0-RC and 2.6 should recognize FreeBSD 8
9 msgPostfix not following my access file.
3 msgpostfix logs delay, delays, dsn
3 msgBest way to shutdown postfix prior to servicing...
1 msgthe bounce process hangs a mail (?)
3 msgmessages destined for content_filter stuck in d...
2 msgDomain in username
5 msgmissing authentication on recipient
5 msgpostfixadmin
5 msgcheck_policy_service before reject_rbl_client
9 msgMXBackup via LDAP
5 msgheader and body check exemptions
5 msgRelay recipient maps and relocated users
4 msgmail forwarding loop :: SPAM
3 msgtransport_maps how to match mx's

Where/when to insert a missing Message-ID
\ Mark Martinec (21 Jan 2008)
. \ (Wietse Venema) (21 Jan 2008)

Subject:Re: Where/when to insert a missing Message-ID
Group:Postfix-users
From:(Wietse Venema)
Date:21 Jan 2008


 
Mark Martinec:
> Here is one not-too-important issue.
>
> When checking some incoming mail signed with historical DomainKeys signatures
> without an 'h' tag (no list of signed headers, implying all are signed),
> I see one source of these messages (bulk, but legitimate commercial junk)
> which is consistently failing signature validation because the sender did not
> provide a Message-ID in its posting, and our receiving Postfix appended a
> Message-ID at the end of the header, this breaking a signature.

By the time any Postfix change reaches significant deployment,
the DomainKeys usage would hopefully be insignificant.

Wietse

> I can see three possibilities:
> - change Postfix to prepend a missing Message-ID, instead of appending it;
> - change Postfix to add a missing Message-ID only for mail matching
> the local_header_rewrite_clients setting;
> - not to bother (as DKIM no longer suffers this problem, making an 'h'
> tag obligatory)
>
> Mark
>
>



© 2004-2008 readlist.com