| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to optimize postfix 10.1.5 and cam across a configuration that looks like a lot of repeated or superfluous calls. ___________________________________________ smtpd_client_restrictions = reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, reject_rbl_client dnsbl.ahbl.org, reject_rbl_client multi.surbl.org, reject_rbl_client postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org, reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org, permit_mynetworks, permit smtpd_recipient_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, permit_sasl_authenticated, reject_invalid_hostname, reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_sender_domain, reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_unauth_destination, reject_rhsbl_sender zen.spamhaus.org, reject_rhsbl_sender rhsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rhsbl_sender bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org, reject_rhsbl_sender dsn.rfc-ignorant.org, permit ___________________________________________ What can this be reduced too and still be effective? In "smtpd_client_restrictions", shouldn't "permit_mynetworks" be first or does it really matter? - -- Dale -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFHizPDgKKwRgpESgMRAptcAJ4ywNwDWqCPBZN9+3Z7/FRzEQanTACfXt9j jPwwcYlWHkNLnfParAu6QX4= =rRDa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com