RE: Virtual spam forwarding issues

2 msg	2 postfix server on the same domain in differen...
3 msg	mailer-deamon sends error messages to: question
3 msg	Procmail
15 msg	MAIL FROM timeout with ciphers=high
2 msg	milter, broken pipe
17 msg	How to listen on 587 as well as 25?
6 msg	reject_sender_login_mismatch doesnt work
2 msg	smtp auth
4 msg	Postfix with MYSQL compile error
8 msg	mynetworks=<empty> vs mynetworks=<defa...
3 msg	message_size_limit with ldap search parameter
2 msg	Pipe debugging
12 msg	destination_concurrency_limit not respected ?

Virtual spam forwarding issues
\ Michael McDermott (29 Nov 2007)
. \ Terry Carmen (29 Nov 2007)
. . \ mouss (29 Nov 2007)
. . . \ Jorey Bump (29 Nov 2007)
. . . . \ Terry Carmen (29 Nov 2007)
. . . . . \ Michael McDermott (29 Nov 2007)
. . . . . \ Jorey Bump (29 Nov 2007)
. . . . . . \ Gerard (30 Nov 2007)
. . . . . . . \ Jorey Bump (30 Nov 2007)
. . . . . . . . \ Michael McDermott (30 Nov 2007)
. . . . . . . . . \ Jorey Bump (30 Nov 2007)
. . . . . . . . . . \ Michael McDermott (30 Nov 2007)
. . . . \ mouss (29 Nov 2007)

2 msg	cleaning up deferred queue
2 msg	static nexthop per domain
2 msg	Simple postmap question
9 msg	Issues with Recipient_Canonical mapping
3 msg	Mail server reboot after got flood
3 msg	can't create a virtual domain

Subject:	RE: Virtual spam forwarding issues
Group:	Postfix-users
From:	Michael McDermott
Date:	30 Nov 2007

>/X-Spam-Level: \*{5,}/ REJECT Identified as spam by SpamAssassin

Yes I'll be definitely using this, perhaps bumped up to about 10 so that I'm
nearly 100% certain what is being rejected is spam. (I too have a
required_score of 5.0 but I have messed with many of the internal
SpamAssassin rules and I get some pretty high scores - some of over 20 and
even 30. I still have a pretty low false positive rate)

>/^[[:digit:]\.-]*$/ REJECT Unacceptable hostname in helo
>/^\[[[:digit:]\.]*\]$/ REJECT Local policy prohibits address literals in
helo
>/^localhost(\.localdomain)?$/ REJECT Unacceptable hostname in helo

This is good too. It would definitely help cut down my server load to reject
more mail before it is filtered.

I think I'll give nolisting a try with one of my domains too. The statistics
on the nolisting.org site look good and it can't hurt to see what results I
get from it.