Re: Suppression of encoding bad header function in postfix

7 msg	Postfix 2.2.5 on latest Solaris 9 x86
5 msg	Postfix Relay, and Pop-before-smtp
12 msg	Newb Question
13 msg	Best defense against this?
1 msg	undelivered mail problem - SOLVED
4 msg	Legal local-part
3 msg	virtual_alias_domains with mysql: 'User unknown...
6 msg	Submission port (587): howto to use differente ...
5 msg	When does smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient kick in?
4 msg	Postfix 'falling back' on sasldb? I don't want ...
3 msg	Nested access maps (I think ;))

Suppression of encoding bad header function in ...
\ Johny Mail list (21 Sep 2007)
. \ Victor Duchovni (21 Sep 2007)
. \ (Wietse Venema) (21 Sep 2007)

4 msg	RE: Catchall ??
3 msg	problem with .forward files + forwarding loops
5 msg	Postfix Strange Behaviours
7 msg	Content filter question, based upon auth'ed or not
28 msg	Mail stuck in active queue for loooong time
11 msg	How to stop a user from changing the 'From:' he...
10 msg	[Semi-OT] blocked port 465, anywhere?
7 msg	chroot problems on Nexenta (OpenSolaris)

Subject:	Re: Suppression of encoding bad header function in postfix
Group:	Postfix-users
From:	(Wietse Venema)
Date:	21 Sep 2007

Johny Mail list:
> Hi list,
> I have noticed between my debian update (3.1 to 4.0) that a function
> had been deleted in the postfix , i think.

Postfix has never encoded message headers.

Wietse

> I explain:
> Before with my Debian 3.1 with postfix 2.1.5 when i sent an email my
> subject and other header was encoded if i put some incorrect
> characters like " ? ? ? ? ...".
> Now with my Debian 4.0 with postfix 2.3.8 when i try to send this kind
> of email, amavis lock it or spamassassin give a hard score to this
> mail because, for example, the subject is not encoded.
>
> I think it's a postfix problem because i have try with php mail()
> function and with mail command from the shell and it's the same.
>
> The configuration between postfix 2.1.5 and postfix 2.3.8 is the same.
>
> Do you have any ideas? Because this make a lot of problems to my customers...
>
> Thanks
>
>