Prev-20 Home Next-20 7 msg Postfix 2.2.5 on latest Solaris 9 x86 5 msg Postfix Relay, and Pop-before-smtp 12 msg Newb Question 13 msg Best defense against this? 1 msg undelivered mail problem - SOLVED 4 msg Legal local-part 3 msg virtual_alias_domains with mysql: 'User unknown... 6 msg Submission port (587): howto to use differente ... 5 msg When does smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient kick in? 4 msg Postfix 'falling back' on sasldb? I don't want ... 3 msg Nested access maps (I think ;)) 3 msg Suppression of encoding bad header function in ... RE: Catchall ?? \ Peter Justus (21 Sep 2007) . \ mouss (21 Sep 2007) . . \ Peter Justus (21 Sep 2007) . . . \ mouss (21 Sep 2007) 3 msg problem with .forward files + forwarding loops 5 msg Postfix Strange Behaviours 7 msg Content filter question, based upon auth'ed or not 28 msg Mail stuck in active queue for loooong time 11 msg How to stop a user from changing the 'From:' he... 10 msg [Semi-OT] blocked port 465, anywhere? 7 msg chroot problems on Nexenta (OpenSolaris) Prev-20 Home Next-20

Prev-Msg Prev-Thread Postfix-users Sep-2007 Next-Thread Next-Msg Subject: RE: Catchall ?? Group: Postfix-users From: Peter Justus Date: 21 Sep 2007 Hi List Is it possible in postfix to have a catchall in the following scenario; I have test which will then receive mail for a range; test1 test2 test3 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... test700 Without having to physically add this range to my database of email addresses etc. Obviously this would be a problem whereby a lot more spam would/could come through? Regards Peter Prev-Msg Prev-Thread Postfix-users Sep-2007 Next-Thread Next-Msg

© 2004-2008 readlist.com