Re: Postfix 'too nice' with content_filter

15 msg	Header for message size?
3 msg	address rewriting
2 msg	address_verify_relayhost and relay_domains
5 msg	pflogsumm reports
11 msg	Changing Queue IDs
3 msg	another authentication failure( with sasl)
2 msg	Bypass Spam checks for certain destinations

Postfix 'too nice' with content_filter
\ Mauro Calderara (19 Sep 2007)
. \ mouss (19 Sep 2007)
. . \ Mauro Calderara (19 Sep 2007)
. \ (Wietse Venema) (19 Sep 2007)
. . \ Mauro Calderara (19 Sep 2007)
. . . \ Victor Duchovni (20 Sep 2007)
. . . . \ Mauro Calderara (20 Sep 2007)
. . . \ (Wietse Venema) (20 Sep 2007)
. . . . \ Mauro Calderara (20 Sep 2007)
. . . . . \ (Wietse Venema) (20 Sep 2007)
. . . . . . \ Mauro Calderara (20 Sep 2007)

7 msg	profiling a milter (dkim in particular)
7 msg	spammers tacking on headers how to block?
7 msg	[Fwd: Re: RFC 821]
1 msg	Re:
4 msg	(No Subject)
2 msg	RFC 821
7 msg	Suspending mail delievery to a specific user
2 msg	Re: OT - massive newsletter
12 msg	List management issue: possibly Off Topic
2 msg	bad protocol error Testing SASL configuration
2 msg	warning: smtpd_sasl_auth_enable is true, but SA...
1 msg	Quota Problem

Subject:	Re: Postfix 'too nice' with content_filter
Group:	Postfix-users
From:	Mauro Calderara
Date:	20 Sep 2007

Wietse Venema:
>> I see. I take it then there no way I could convince Postfix to not
>> spread it out over that much time as the algorithm finds the optimum
>> concurrency without user-interference.
>
> Absent other disasters, the delayed mail wil be delivered in an
> hour or so.
>
> If your system has been delaying mail for hours already, adding
> another hour doesn't hurt, and the delayed mail won't interfere
> too much with other delivery.

OK, so we'll just be a bit more patient. Given the fact that normal
delivery should not be overly delayed by the backlog due to errors or
"rush hour" phenomena, this should be fine.

Thanks again for the patience and advice

mauro