Re: Correct use of smtpd_tls_security_level

7 msg	Invalid Sender Address syntax
2 msg	high availability
2 msg	BFD (Brute Force Detection) & Postfix
5 msg	relay domain and forwarding
2 msg	dk-milter - emal size issues
5 msg	Mail sent from local machine shows undisclosed-...
16 msg	Sorting incoming mails according to rules

Correct use of smtpd_tls_security_level
\ M. Fioretti (16 Jun 2007)
. \ M. Fioretti (16 Jun 2007)
. \ Ralf Hildebrandt (16 Jun 2007)
. . \ M. Fioretti (16 Jun 2007)
. . . \ Ralf Hildebrandt (16 Jun 2007)

1 msg	graph queue sizes
6 msg	large deferred queue ('too many connections')
3 msg	To see IP's
5 msg	How Can I Block certain IP's Within Range of my...
8 msg	Question about adding a special header to emails
3 msg	rcpt count mismatch and corrupt queue file ?
2 msg	too many connections
11 msg	Whitelist broken email servers?
4 msg	Write failed in network_biopair_interop with er...
2 msg	Pattern-matching in HELO
3 msg	header_checks du jour
3 msg	Good Resource for additional Spam Blocking

Subject:	Re: Correct use of smtpd_tls_security_level
Group:	Postfix-users
From:	Ralf Hildebrandt
Date:	16 Jun 2007

* M. Fioretti <mfioretti>:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 23:26:23 PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt) wrote:

> Yes again, I see the reason not to use "encrypt" now. Last but not
> least, just to be on the safe side: OK, the smtpd_sender_restriction
> thing is not necessary from _this_ point of view, but I haven't
> _forgotten_ any other necessary setting to do what I stated in my
> original message, right?

It looks ok...

--
Ralf Hildebrandt (Ralf.Hildebrandt) plonk
Postfix - Einrichtung, Betrieb und Wartung Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
http://www.arschkrebs.de
"The report of my death was an exaggeration."
-Mark Twain, After reading his own obituary, June 2, 1897