| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
> Greetings, > > the postfix sasl readme, http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.htm > > says: > > >The Cyrus SASL library is a lot of code. With this, Postfix becomes > >as secure as other mail systems that use the Cyrus SASL library. > >Dovecot provides an alternative that may be worth considering. > > In principle, I like the idea of doing without Cyrus, since I have > to run an IMAP server anyway and had already chosen Dovecot. > However, I would like to know what other list members think of this > approach: is it as secure as Cyrus, are you using it but > configured differently, is that page up to date... > > The page also says: > > >Support for the Dovecot version 1 SASL protocol is available in > >Postfix 2.3 and later. > > If one only has a binary package of Postfix, how can he check if > dovecot support was compiled in? (without finding the makefile and > looking at it, that is) > > TIA, > Marco > > I am using postfix 2.3 with dovecot sasl for authentication for almost 1 year now and never had an issue with it. It is very easy to set it up. In main.cf: smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot # Can be an absolute path, or relative to $queue_directory smtpd_sasl_path = private/dovecotauth In dovecot.conf: auth default { mechanisms = plain login # and whatever .... some config ... socket listen { client { path = /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecotauth mode = 0660 user = postfix group = postfix } } }
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com