| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
> They may very well require that ".<CR><LF>" be sent separately, > instead of concatenated to the message content. > In that case delay_dotcrlf would do the job. My thought as well, but unfortunately it does not help (or fortunately) even if I slowly send a small mail manually through telnet, taking care to send a .CRLF alone in a packet. The IP stack keeps acknowledging further packets, and nothing else happens. The MailEnable Service v1.96 on 85.25.147.47 is really borked. > This would not surprise me, considering that older MailEnable > versions could be crashed by sending a HELO command with a bogus > hostname that starts with a null character. > http://www.juniper.net/security/auto/vulnerabilities/vuln3361.html Interesting. The version fits. Victor writes: > You could try sending to this destination via an SMTP proxy (say a > modified amavisd-new :-) that implements the necessary delays, and if > that works, we can better motivate a new Postfix feature... Thanks:) It seems a workaround will not be needed, no amount of good will is able to push a mail across. (mail has been stuck in our queue for 5 days; also tried to send manually from another machine from a different network with no firewall, to no avail). Mark
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com