| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
> On Tue, 15 May 2007, Lars Johansen wrote: > > >Hi we have a setup with postfixadmin and virtual users.. everything > >works great, but we have one issue. > > > >We want to use a 3rd party spam service provider.. but we dont want to > >set our MX records to them.. > > > > I work for one of those "third party spam service providers" (no, I can't > which one, sorry.) > > If you receive all of your email, forward it to a 3rd party, ask them to > filter it, and send legitimate mail back to you, you're going to be > blowing a huge amount of bandwidth. You'll be sending spam messages > through your pipe at least twice, and legitimate mail through at least > three times. Not a good idea. Only if bandwidth is noticeably expensive, email is not a large fraction of overall bandwidth for large organizations, ... > Also, most third part spam service providers use some form of IP > reputation schema. This means that you will be sending all of your mail > flow (including spam) to them, and this will poison their IP reputation > database AGAINST you. Only if implemented poorly (say without XFORWARD or topmost received header parsing), don't use 3rd parties that do the job poorly. -- Viktor. Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below: <mailto:majordomo?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users> If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put "It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com