Re: When is 'for <recipient>' present in header?

11 msg	(noob-newbie here) Configuring postfix to be us...
5 msg	(No Subject)

When is 'for <recipient>'present in header?
\ Francisco Reyes (16 Apr 2007)
. \ Ralf Hildebrandt (16 Apr 2007)
. \ Victor Duchovni (16 Apr 2007)

2 msg	client does not detect mail
11 msg	Empty MAIL FROM
3 msg	Change format of emails in active directory
3 msg	Logging a message from within a restriction list
4 msg	mailbox_transport_maps lookup key
10 msg	mailbox_transport_maps problem
5 msg	Default value of unknown_address_reject_code
9 msg	Issue with using LDAP for transport maps
4 msg	limit max. used bandwith?
2 msg	maximum number of smtpd_restriction_classes
5 msg	'transport_maps' getting ignored?
3 msg	Server configuration problem
6 msg	smtpd_sasl_auth_enable is true, but SASL suppor...
3 msg	Mail to local domains
2 msg	nonexistent virtual account received
13 msg	How to make postfix use one IP for receiving an...
3 msg	ldap search fails

Subject:	Re: When is 'for <recipient>' present in header?
Group:	Postfix-users
From:	Victor Duchovni
Date:	16 Apr 2007

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 09:28:53AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:

> Is there always supposed to be a "for <recipient>" component in a message
> header?

No.

> I tried to look for a pattern, but couldn't find one.. as to when "for
> <recipient>" would appear on the header and when not.

Have you ever seen two recipients listed in the "for <recipient>"
trace field?

--
Viktor.

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header.

To unsubscribe from the postfix-users list, visit
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html or click the link below:
<mailto:majordomo?body=unsubscribe%20postfix-users>

If my response solves your problem, the best way to thank me is to not
send an "it worked, thanks" follow-up. If you must respond, please put
"It worked, thanks" in the "Subject" so I can delete these quickly.