Re: Inverse access restrictions?

3 msg	Postfix + cyrus imapd data format error. Comman...

Inverse access restrictions?
\ Lloyd Zusman (11 Apr 2007)
. \ Benny Pedersen (11 Apr 2007)
. \ Kai Fürstenberg (11 Apr 2007)
. \ Martin Schmitt (11 Apr 2007)
. \ Lloyd Zusman (11 Apr 2007)
. . \ (Wietse Venema) (11 Apr 2007)
. . \ Noel Jones (11 Apr 2007)
. . \ Martin Schmitt (11 Apr 2007)
. \ Lloyd Zusman (11 Apr 2007)
. \ Lloyd Zusman (11 Apr 2007)
. . \ Martin Schmitt (11 Apr 2007)
. . . \ Noel Jones (11 Apr 2007)
. . . . \ Martin Schmitt (11 Apr 2007)
. . \ Noel Jones (11 Apr 2007)
. . \ mouss (11 Apr 2007)
. \ Lloyd Zusman (11 Apr 2007)
. . \ mouss (11 Apr 2007)
. \ Lloyd Zusman (12 Apr 2007)

9 msg	forward only certain user's email to google app...
4 msg	Postfix + MySQL engine type
21 msg	smtpd_restriction_classes and local delivery
7 msg	transport_maps and auto reply daemon
8 msg	_sasl_plugin_load failed on sasl_auxprop_plug_init
6 msg	SMTP AUTH via LDAP
3 msg	Out: 451 Error: queue file write error
5 msg	FW: Postfix Looping Issue
9 msg	request for help - setting up postfix
6 msg	SecuritySage Guides - New Location
2 msg	Adress extension propagation with virtual alias...
10 msg	Not adding Received hdr for auth'ed users
3 msg	SPamd ?
2 msg	OT: google trends - postfix/sendmail/qmail/exim
1 msg	RE: Cached MX?
3 msg	Something wrong with my servers ?
9 msg	Outgoing Mail Scanning
10 msg	Certificate recommendation?

Subject:	Re: Inverse access restrictions?
Group:	Postfix-users
From:	Lloyd Zusman
Date:	12 Apr 2007

mouss <mlist.only <at> free.fr> writes:

>
> [ ... clear and useful explanations snipped ... ]
>
> if you can organize your restrictions on a per recipient basis, you can
> use the approach mentioned above. if you organize your restrictions per
> check, then use the pcre approach.

Yep, all that makes sense. Thank you for the explanations and clarification.

--
Lloyd Zusman
hippoman
God bless you.