| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
> Pieter Verberne <pieterverberne> writes: > "public domain" is a meaningless term in many countries (it doesn't have > any meaning in courts, which in turn means that you keep all the rights > that copyright law gives you). > > In many countries you can't give up the right to be recognized as the > author even if you want to. Like in my country. But that does not mean I have to use permissive licenses, that means there is a error in the law. Copyright should be optional; It should be assigned automaticly, but I also should be able to take distance of (abandon) copyright. It sucks that anyone who wants to put there work in public domain has to use a license text instead. So, I've written the Dutch ministry of justice about it. Things should be solved on the right place; that is where the law is. Permissive licenses are sometimes used as a kind of nasty workaround (hack) for putting things effectively in public domain (!by those who don't care about keeping copyright!). *sigh* whatever.. I guess I'm just dutchman.. or so.. My minimalism is probably somewhat obsessive:) > > BTW, how many times is the BSD license in the source repository? I think > > it is a filthiness of "$ head [sourcefile]". > > I think it's pretty. Makes the code feel like home. -_-
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com