| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
> On 05/10/2008 08:40 PM, Bart Silverstrim wrote: >> Peter Frenning [OZ1PIF] wrote: >> >>> Not a problem with mine.... >>> BTW: I normally format them NTFS, that generally works with every system >>> I've thrown them at, while ext3 or other *nix/*nux filesystems aren't >>> recognized by Windoze... >> While that may not be a problem in your situation, I would note that >> there are situations I've run into where NTFS is mounted read-only. >> NTFS drivers for Linux have relatively recently migrated to being RW >> with stability. >> >> For cross-platform use, I'd first recommend using FAT32. Everything and >> their cousin reads and writes to it but it does have security problems. >> In select cases I've encapsulated filesystems in other files to >> preserve metadata (DMG images for the Mac, for example) so they can be >> stored on FAT32. > > FAT32 has a 4GB file limitation - 4 GiB minus 1 "Null" Byte (232-1 > bytes), volume limitation of 32GB, and is no longer actually maintained > is it? I've got 4 NTFS partions that I'm doing READ/WRITE with under Hardy Heron. Three of them are huge SATA drives and 1 is a partition on my main *nix drive. I also have 1 FAT32 partition (500gb) that will go away as soon as I'm done getting this new box organized (with Virtualbox for the few Windows apps I have to have and another virtual for playing with the Leo4All "Hackintosh"). A year ago I'd have said use FAT32, but now I see no reason not to keep anything Windows-ish in NTFS. -- Cheers, SDM -- a 21st Century Schizoid Man. Systems Theory internet music project: www.systemstheory.net on MySpace: www.myspace.com/systemstheory on Last FM: www.last.fm.com/systemstheory NP: nothing -- ubuntu-users mailing list ubuntu-users Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com