| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Matt S Trout <dbix-class> wrote: > > On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:06:30AM -0700, J. Shirley wrote: > > I fail to see how whether the PK is the lookup key or not has any > > relevance at all to the original point, which was "your lookup key and > > names of actions might clash so it can be nice to have an extra path > > component such as 'id' for the lookup part to disambiguate". > > Because I'm talking about REST and a verb in the URI doesn't need to be > there. But those nouns you're talking about aren't verbs at all. Andrew _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com