| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Terry R." <Terry.F1ComNOSPAM> wrote: > The date and time was 5/9/2008 3:31 PM, and on a whim, »Q« pounded > out on the keyboard: > > > "Terry R." <Terry.F1ComNOSPAM> wrote: > > > >> The date and time was 5/9/2008 2:59 PM, and on a whim, »Q« pounded > >> out on the keyboard: > >> > >>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 20:14:25 -0600 > >>> Lon Stowell <lon.stowell> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Ray_Net wrote: > >>>>> Terry Kepner wrote: > >>>>>> I just recovered from Service Pack 3 for XP trashing my > >>>>>> Windows completely. > >>>>> I just installed XP-SP3 and i am lucky - windows working > >>>>> normally except for the first time after the firtst reboot. > >>>> I had all high priority Pro/SP2 upgrades installed, and the > >>>> update to XP3 was one of the most boring upgrades I've seen. > >>>> Seamonkey ran flawlessly and even RealPlayer ran afterwards. > >>>> > >>>> The ISO image version was even fast. > >>> I think MS needs a checklist for handling release media. From the > >>> SP3 iso: > >>> > >>> ----- > >>> /media/opticaldrive $ lynx --dump faq.htm | head -n 7 > >>> > >>> More information about installing Service Pack 2 > >>> > >>> [1]How long will it take to install Service Pack 2? > >>> > >>> [2]How will the security of my computer be enhanced? > >>> > >>> [3]Where can I get more information about Service Pack 2? > >>> ----- > >>> > >>> [followup set to mozilla.general] > >> What do those items have to do with SP3? > > > > Nothing other than their presence on the SP3 cd. > > Why would "their presence" be needed on an SP3 cd? Why would ANY > info about SP2 be needed on an SP3 cd? It's not needed. It's a mistake, which is why I said I think they need a checklist. _______________________________________________ general mailing list general https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com