Re: HTML mail (was: FIltering newsgroups)

1 msg	Seeking Search Engine Enthusiast
6 msg	Newsgroups, Usenet, and Telnets

Re: HTML mail (was: FIltering newsgroups)
\ John Thompson (7 Feb 2008)

1 msg	window.find()
1 msg	Mozilla Scheduled Maintenance - 2/5/2008,7pm - ...
1 msg	mozilla sucks
53 msg	Re: FIltering newsgroups
1 msg	Opera (WAS: E-mail attachments....OT, Opera)
2 msg	PING translators and linguists...
17 msg	Flash won't play nice (?)
2 msg	Re: Microsoft Silverlight
6 msg	Fwd: firefox help
10 msg	Sunbird 0.2
2 msg	Tech Evangelism Web Site
4 msg	Is this the correct forum to ask a question abo...
71 msg	Re: Mozilla Scheduled Maintenance - 1/24/2008, ...
1 msg	Mozilla Scheduled Maintenance - 1/24/2008,7pm -...
32 msg	Mozilla on Usenet
1 msg	Mozilla Scheduled Maintenance - 1/22/2008,7pm -...
8 msg	SM a disappointment?

Subject:	Re: HTML mail (was: FIltering newsgroups)
Group:	Mozilla-general
From:	John Thompson
Date:	7 Feb 2008

On 2008-02-06, Peter Lairo <Peter> wrote:
><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
><html>
><head>
> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
> <title></title>
></head>
><body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
> Leonidas Jones on 02.02.2008 01:52 wrote:
><blockquote cite="mid:Kq2dndh3hsMjIz7anZ2dnUVZ_oKhnZ2d"
> type="cite">we are all using plain text here, right? 
></blockquote>
> 
> Another "HTML e-mails are eeevil" flamewar? class="moz-smiley-s14"> O:-) 
> 
> (I don't mind HTML e-mails. They are generally easier to read, flow
> better, and can contain useful markup. I just don't like remote image
> and such for privacy/security reasons. All "regular" HTML is OK. We're
> all on broadband here, right?). 
><pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--

They don't "flow better" here... :-(

--

John (john)
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general