16 msgturning on recursion in bind 9.2.2 makes ssh lo...
3 msgbind 9.4 memory exhaustion
7 msgBind 9.4.2 not resolving external names but see...
3 msgBind-DLZ question
3 msgManipulating the Round robin
3 msgSlaves doesn't handle 'expire' time correctly?
10 msgBasic setup question for a master / slave setup...
6 msgsplit DNS for clients through a proxy
9 msgout -of-zone records
2 msgI want to remain log in '/var/log/messages'
5 msghttp fail over with srv records
3 msgnamed-checkzone -D
3 msgnamed-checkzone comes unglues
1 msgSpurious 'CNAME and other data' with signed zones

BIND and AD DNS
\ Beavis (10 Jan 2008)
. \ Kevin Darcy (10 Jan 2008)
. . \ Niall O'Reilly (10 Jan 2008)
. . . \ Beavis (10 Jan 2008)
. . . . \ Chris Cox (10 Jan 2008)
. . . \ Kevin Darcy (10 Jan 2008)
. \ Mark Andrews (10 Jan 2008)
. . \ Beavis (10 Jan 2008)

3 msgWarning: ID mismatch Error!
3 msgtwo errors
10 msgDynamic updates AND multiple zones referencing ...
2 msgweb interface
4 msgdns updates from a windows client
Subject:Re: BIND and AD DNS
Group:Bind-users
From:Beavis
Date:10 Jan 2008


 
I'm running a jailed version of bind 9.3.4 on Openbsd. I'll read up on
GSS-TSIG and if I can't make it on 9.3 I'll just go and update it to
9.5

thanks,
beavis


On Jan 10, 2008 5:01 PM, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews> wrote:
>
> BIND 9.5 (currently in beta) supported GSS-TSIG which will
> help with integration with AD.
>
> Mark
>
>
> > thanks for the awesome replies guys. most of the resources available
> > on google mostly explain about having a zone-file on the BIND box that
> > is update-able by the AD DNS's. anyways, I'll take these into account
> > as well as whatever resource that are available on the internet and
> > work from there.
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> > -b
> >
> > On Jan 10, 2008 11:42 AM, Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly> wrote:
> > > On 10 Jan 2008, at 03:12, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> > >
> > > > Iterative resolvers will see the delegation, and
> > > > subsequent queries for names in the domain will use the Microsoft DNS
> > > > servers, for as long as that delegation information persists in the
> > > > iterative resolver's cache.
> > >
> > > I think you mean,
> > >
> > > "Iterative resolvers will see the delegation, retrieve the
> > > relevant RRset (answer) from the Microsoft DNS servers, place
> > > it in cache, deliver it to the querying client, and avoid
> > > querying the Microsoft DNS servers for the same RRset until
> > > the cached copy has expired."
> > >
> > > No ?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Niall O'Reilly
> > > University College Dublin IT Services
> > >
> > > PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net)
> > > Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews
>




© 2004-2008 readlist.com