| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
professional router/gateways. These router/gateways provide DHCP services for the LAN, and are thus providing LAN hosts with DNS information dynamically. The DNS servers that the LAN hosts are pointed to are BIND servers running on the LAN. In these router/ gateways, there is no DHCP specific option for specifying the the IP address to offer for DNS. The only solution is to assign the LAN address of the BIND server in the router's WAN configuration. The result that I believe is achieved is that the router/gateway provides the LAN address of the local BIND host to the local clients (this part I know to be correct). When needing name resolving service, the local clients query the DNS service on the LAN, and the BIND service uses full recursion to query authoritative name servers on the internet, passing these queries, and all replies, through the very router/gateway that provided the DHCP service. This seems to function, but not perfectly; I notice that web pages and similar services that depend on name resolution load more slowly than I'd expect them to, but I'm not sure why. I am not certain whether the router 'appreciates' having to look inward to the LAN for name resolution, or having to pass the DNS responses on to the BIND server on the LAN instead of handling them itself. There exists an option in the router/gateway to toggle on or off 'Provide DNS proxy service', which I have turned off, so that the router/gateway will not try to use its own DNS configuration (which, as described earlier, points to the BIND server on the LAN) to resolve the outgoing queries from the BIND server. This would obviously cause a never-ending loop between the BIND service running on the LAN and the router/gateway itself. I have a feeling that the best solution would be to move the DHCP service to one of the internal linux servers, and to be done with it all, but it doesn't resolve my curiosity regarding this arrangement, nor does it provide me the time to rearrange DHCP service, which is really limited at the moment. Any insight on whether this convoluted configuration could ever work would be really appreciated! Thanks, Steven Stromer
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com