| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
> --On Tuesday, June 26, 2007 15:48:08 -0700 Chris Buxton > <cbuxton> wrote: >> >> - You can use some kind of management system that allows you to edit >> dynamic zones as if they were static zones. There are commercial >> solutions out there, such as one made by my company; there may also >> be FOSS solutions available. > > There definitely are FOSS solutions, like the one made by my company. > :) > > I haven't posted about it to the list for a while, but Carnegie > Mellon's NetReg system handles this. It issues dynamic updates to > the zone for records that it owns, and ignores the records that were > inserted by the dhcp server or any other dynamic dns updating system. > (As an added bonus, NetReg builds the config files for both ISC dhcpd > and bind, complete with TSIG keys, etc... And you get an IP address > management system too.) Been meaning to check out TSIG maybe deploy it with my setup, though I'm not sure if this will be doable for the domains I slave via ZoneEdit.com. > Check out my previous posts on this list for more details, such as > this one: > <http://groups.google.com/group/comp.protocols.dns.bind/browse_thread/threa > d/1859cdb39ad7f6d9/6b695beab712012e?lnk=st&q=&rnum=12#6b695beab712012e&g t; Thank you. Will do. >> - You can use nsupdate instead of freeze/thaw to manage your static >> entries. Just make sure to tune your update-policy statement to allow >> what you want. > > Similar to that approach, I have a perl script that parses a > named.conf file to extract the TSIG key for a zone, and uses the > Net::DNS perl libraries to issues a TSIG signed update to a zone. > (If anyone wants a copy, I'm happy to put it up on the CMU netreg > website.) Sure, would be nice to check out. -- CL
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com