Prev-20 Home Next-20 15 msg SPF on 9.4.1 now? 2 msg bind-workers list doesn't exists? 4 msg rootserver info 3 msg Information about libraries versions 4 msg 'host' Return Codes 3 msg Secondary Server not answerig authoritative for... Strange problem \ Jean-François Leroux (18 May 2007) . \ Kevin Darcy (18 May 2007) . . \ Jean-François Leroux (19 May 2007) . . . \ Tony Earnshaw (20 May 2007) . . . . \ Jean-François Leroux (20 May 2007) . . . \ MÃ¥ns Nilsson (21 May 2007) . . . . \ Jean-François Leroux (21 May 2007) . . . . . \ MÃ¥ns Nilsson (25 May 2007) . \ Clenna Lumina (22 Jun 2007) . . \ MÃ¥ns Nilsson (25 Jun 2007) . \ Clenna Lumina (25 Jun 2007) . . \ MÃ¥ns Nilsson (27 Jun 2007) . . . \ Niall O'Reilly (27 Jun 2007) . \ Clenna Lumina (27 Jun 2007) 2 msg dual internal/external chrooted bind w/third se... 2 msg DNS authoritative server and private domain? 2 msg rndc: 'reload' failed: out of memory 1 msg dnscap -x, openbsd port, see <http://public.... 11 msg resolv.conf option for nameserver with specific... 2 msg 'dnscap -x' anybody? 8 msg bind9 is taking little Breaks for Some Reason. 6 msg resolve.conf 2 msg re: last call on dnscap 8 msg 4 DNS servers, 1 BIND9 slave, 2 BIND8.4 slaves,... 3 msg logging 'successes' 2 msg reverse lookup entry in BIND configuration 5 msg resolve external and internal Domains. Prev-20 Home Next-20

Prev-Msg Prev-Thread Bind-users May-2007 Next-Thread Next-Msg Subject: Re: Strange problem Group: Bind-users From: Måns Nilsson Date: 25 May 2007 --On måndag, måndag 21 maj 2007 23.40.41 +0200 Jean-François Leroux <leroux.jeanfrancois> wrote: >> >> Doubled notifies should not be a problem; they're just discarded or >> NOOP's. >> Make certain that you see a notify from the server you have in masters >> {}; directive -- the slave will by default discard notifies from servers >> not in >> masters {}; (But also look at "allow-notify"). > > Yes, the slave discards notifies, as I've seen in the log. Now can I (or > should I) allow notification from my internal slave, either by adding it > as a master for that zone or by adding it in my 'notifers' acl, which is > used inside the zone statement? > What I'd like to do is giving redundancy, but I'm not sure this is the > correct way to do it. Having multiple masters is one idea. If played right, you can automatically avoid problems caused by losing any one node (except perhaps the hidden master; there, you might need to do manual work.) by having multiple paths. > One idea; is the zone size >> significant? It might be so that the notify arrives from S1 to S4 and is >> processed before the zone has been properly transfered to S2. > > > Well, no, the zone isn't really significant ( about 100 lines), but the > idea was fine. Actually, reinstalling bind9 solved this, so I guess > something had gone wrong when updating from 9.3.2 to 9.3.4. > > Thanks for your answer too. > > > > -- Måns Nilsson Systems Specialist +46 70 681 7204 cell KTHNOC +46 8 790 6518 office MN1334-RIPE Yow! I'm imagining a surfer van filled with soy sauce! Prev-Msg Prev-Thread Bind-users May-2007 Next-Thread Next-Msg

© 2004-2008 readlist.com