2 msghow do I force a zone transfer
13 msgnamed.conf cannot be changed
1 msghow to Build RBL using bind9 ?
17 msgBIND 9.3.2 and temp box.
2 msgBIND9 CNAME format
2 msgrate of update queries?
5 msgbind 9.4 srcrpm / spec file for centos 4x
3 msgMulti-Master and NOTIFY
3 msg9.4.0b4 problems
3 msgWeb Interface for BIND9
4 msgpop email issue
4 msgBLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG quit responding?
1 msgDocumentation of forwarding behaviour ?
2 msgDNSSEC
12 msgHow to reduce the number of IP address returned...
2 msgMany un-resolved domains
8 msgReverse DNS not working for new server
6 msgOn-line nslookup?
14 msgAccuracy of DNSStuff reports

Help Understanding Cache Poisoining
\ Will (25 Nov 2006)
. \ Peter Dambier (25 Nov 2006)
. \ Will (26 Nov 2006)
. \ Barry Margolin (28 Nov 2006)

Subject:Re: Help Understanding Cache Poisoining
Group:Bind-users
From:Barry Margolin
Date:28 Nov 2006


 
In article <ekas3n$2ala$1>,
"Will" <westes-usc> wrote:

> But the question was *how* does that poisoining happen? I see how a
> hacker can do a denial of service attack, but not how they can get the
> resolver to enter in bad values.

Often cache poisoning requires the resolver to look up names in a
particular domain that's legitimately delegated to the poisoner's
servers. The response to that query contains the "poison" data that
gets entered into the cache.

With a closed recursive server, you have to get one of the ISP's
customers to try to look up this domain -- maybe infect him with a
virus, use a domain that's a misspelling of a common domain, send him
spam with a link to your domain, etc.

But with an open server, all you have to do is send a query to the
server.

--
Barry Margolin, barmar
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***




© 2004-2008 readlist.com