3 msgSlave DNS server not taking over.
4 msgTLD wildcard doesn't always work
20 msgbind replication between sites
2 msgLeast expensive, most robust infrastructure
4 msginclude files in named.conf.local
2 msgNewbie: Multiple Domains
20 msgHost = domain
2 msgUnexpected Token? SERVFAIL?
2 msgBIND 9.3.2 and Solaris 10 zones

Configuring Absolute minimum TTL in BIND-8.4.7
\ Stefan Schoeman (18 Jul 2006)
. \ Barry Margolin (18 Jul 2006)
. \ Stefan Schoeman (18 Jul 2006)

13 msgbuilding a DNS system
2 msgDynamic Reverse Configuration
3 msgResolve single word names?
9 msgHow to override an A record
8 msgRound-robin for high availability?
8 msgCache poisoning
7 msgStrange / Frustrating Caching Problems
8 msgName Servers
4 msgWhy is slave zone different from master zone..?
1 msgBind - named exiting (due to assertion failure)
Subject:Configuring Absolute minimum TTL in BIND-8.4.7
Group:Bind-users
From:Stefan Schoeman
Date:18 Jul 2006


 
Hello to the BIND-users list,

I am a newly subscribed member to this list, so kindly forgive any faux pas
that I might make when asking assistance. I have searched through the
mailing list archives for an answer to an issue I am experiencing, but I had
not luck, so please don't flame me in case I am asking something that is
regularly asked here. Please also feel free to point me towards the correct
protocol in case this is a dumb question...

In any case, I have a BIND-8.4.7 server that acts as a secondary from a
MyDNS server. The axfr works just fine, but it seems that Bind ignores the
TTL on records where the TTL is less than 300s (5 minutes). It does not
matter if I set the TTL of a record to something smaller (like 30s) on the
MyDNS server, when BIND axfr's it, it makes that TTL 300s. The only thing I
can suspect is that in the Bind source somewhere, there is a #define that
specifies what the minimum TTL is that Bind will accept. If it axfr's a
value less than this, it overrides it with its minimum.

Now I've tried searching through the Bind source for anything '300' and I
have found some definitions, but unfortunately, I cannot assess whether this
is the setting that I am looking for. Could anyone that has encountered this
(and rectified it), please point me in the right direction on where I can
change this?

Thanks,

Stefan Schoeman
South Africa








© 2004-2008 readlist.com