RE: Need recommendation on keyserver code

2 msg	Weird error
2 msg	Automating, passwd command replies, 'Need the s...
1 msg	Updated copy of pinentry-mac available.
3 msg	Re: Protecting private key on USB flash drive: ...
7 msg	SVN version not correctly displaying
3 msg	Trust model syntax
3 msg	[Fwd: Re: Protecting private key on USB flash d...
2 msg	Can't sign & encrypt from command line
16 msg	Protecting private key on USB flash drive: how to?
2 msg	How to decrypt multiple blocks of encrypt messa...
2 msg	Hash algo for Gnupg
7 msg	Problem with FSFE gpg card
2 msg	Suggestions on how to compile for cygwin

Need recommendation on keyserver code
\ Alan Olsen (6 May 2008)
. \ Werner Koch (7 May 2008)
. \ John Clizbe (7 May 2008)
. \ John Clizbe (7 May 2008)
. . \ Alan Olsen (7 May 2008)
. . . \ David Shaw (7 May 2008)
. . . \ Todd Zullinger (7 May 2008)
. . . . \ Alan Olsen (8 May 2008)
. \ Todd Zullinger (8 May 2008)
. . \ Alan Olsen (8 May 2008)
. . . \ Alan Olsen (12 May 2008)

3 msg	confused about public key strength
7 msg	Compile without libiconv or libintl on Solaris
1 msg	Duplicity
2 msg	[Fwd: Re: Question about GnuPG Smartcard]
1 msg	GPG in several computers
1 msg	[REPOST] LDAP Basic Auth not working for key se...

Subject:	RE: Need recommendation on keyserver code
Group:	Gnupg-users
From:	Alan Olsen
Date:	8 May 2008

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Todd Zullinger wrote:

> Alan Olsen wrote:
>> Those patches do not fix my build problems. (It is running out of
>> memory compiling numerix.ml.)

>Odd. I built it again before sending the patches, on an up to date Fedora 8 box (i386).
> It did compile. I didn't test any further though.

I believe the problem has to do with the version of OCAML I am using. 3.10.1 seems to have problems. 3.10.2 has been released. I am going to try that. I am also using x86_64 and that may have something to do with it.

>> Your patches are also for a much earlier version of numerix.

>Yeah, the numerix patch was against the version of numerix included in the sks tarball.
> Packaging numerix and making sks use the system numerix would be better (if possible),
> but it wasn't something I looked at.

The patch takes a bit to apply. The code still needs patching at that point in the code. The code location has changed quite a bit though.

>> I have sent mail to the SKS author to see if he has any ideas.

>Good luck. :)

Probably need it. It has been a chore to get anything working with SKS. Probably since I am using a version of Fedora 9 out of Rawhide...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wsBVAwUBSCN1f2qdmbpu7ejzAQrcSAgAvNsY4zSZafIfUOqUzmGl2jzm0ILGUwJT
Gg3VrWAT4e8AEquCy2OBablfjM81sLkeB3D9SAHLYxInnB67JpKHLyKzBY7KcKXD
TawOZRMuKLUqTTK7Ripj3VRFYLOKa7pflbxzpAHUuejbJMD1A7fGw+fyyJZuXxE3
/ur9XFUp0l1NdDbPzULbpau37/5x6d+kK01KnZRBi/9hEDGRH4j0RhAUKkXTzszX
sNqwa1KhySO9V7uv8miRK6qxsSEGdrnABdF+ILCj4ywo01FoKc1koSU+/asz4Fxt
68h+mJ3LOUeadRcJr7NvB/qb/Z58l1T8zgNYlJW1D+8ZjFxz0ehQqA==
=56nO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users