| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hash: SHA1 ~ Hi everyone. I know this is probably a bit late, since I generally get the digest, and also only log on infrequently, but felt I might for the sake of anyone interested mention that I'm still using gpg 1.4.8 with Enigmail and thunderbird 2.0.0.12, and I think it pretty much works. ~ I also use to use GPGshell occasionally, just for a nice clear interface. ~ My question is should I upgrade to 1.4.9 for any particular reason? My understanding was that .8 is still more or less "current". Is .9 a security upgrade? ~ As an aside, I have an older version 1.4.1 I think on an older machine that runs an old linux system (Red Hat 9 to be specific) and I think keys created on that machine are compatible with 1.4.9, however on an even older system (Red Hat 7) I recall building a version of gpg 1.2.3 with the help of rpm. Would keys created with that version be usable or are they incompatible? ~ Michael. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) iD8DBQFH9RacVlIM867aTsoRAuDNAJ45Jl/eGIXjLYNapPBFTifyjdvdvACgwgmJ ZPQyNH3MNsna27vLHPHmP24= =A4m3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004-2008 readlist.com