can you see any problem with this?

2 msg	Kmail/gnupg fails to encrypt on F8
1 msg	GPGee development restarted - need bugs
18 msg	How know who is a file encrypted for ?
2 msg	Key Server
2 msg	passphrase works ONLY with enigmail
1 msg	OT // truecrypt 5 // whole disk encryption
7 msg	SMIME vs PGP
2 msg	Re: Any plans for GnuPG to implement decrypting...
5 msg	Anti-Tempest Fonts, Where?
19 msg	Safe decryption with GnuPG?

can you see any problem with this?
\ Adrian Thurston (5 Feb 2008)
. \ Robert J. Hansen (5 Feb 2008)
. . \ Adrian Thurston (5 Feb 2008)
. \ David Shaw (5 Feb 2008)
. . \ Adrian Thurston (5 Feb 2008)
. . . \ David Shaw (5 Feb 2008)
. . . . \ Adrian Thurston (5 Feb 2008)

2 msg	Using notations on data signatures
1 msg	re: gnupg for file splitting and re-constitutin...
1 msg	gnupg for file splitting and re-constituting
19 msg	Can you clarify when data compression is used?
5 msg	more than one recipient
5 msg	Orphaned secret subkeys
4 msg	export/import additional user id
1 msg	adding a simple email address to a key
3 msg	UID order

Subject:	can you see any problem with this?
Group:	Gnupg-users
From:	Adrian Thurston
Date:	5 Feb 2008

Hi,

I'd like to serve messages that have been encrypted to a large number of
people, however I don't want to reveal the list of recipients so I'm
going to use --throw-keys.

But speed at the decryption end is a concern, so I thought I would break
up an encrypted message into packets and when a client requests it serve
up only the packet that corresponds to the session key encrypted to
them, then the content packet. I haven't tried it yet, but it seems as
though it should work. I'd like to know if there is any non-obvious
reason why it is a bad idea.

Thanks,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users