Re: new key // sorry, bad sig

8 msg	adding a new email to a key
3 msg	How to export/import my private key
4 msg	keypair to/from armor format
3 msg	Multiple PCs
2 msg	Changing hash on Windows Vista with gpg4win v1.1.3
10 msg	How true can this be?
1 msg	SVN 4679
1 msg	generate command fails on OpenPGP cards
11 msg	Problem with keys imported via DNS CERT
8 msg	Need tips on how to backup my keys
6 msg	GnuPG Summer Riddle 2007
18 msg	IDEA

new key // sorry, bad sig
\ vedaal (23 Jan 2008)
. \ Ingo Klöcker (24 Jan 2008)
. \ vedaal (24 Jan 2008)

1 msg	new key
3 msg	GPG Home Directory
3 msg	IDEA licensing issues
1 msg	Re: [Enigmail] Keyservers mangle with subkey bi...
6 msg	Fwd: is there any remote possibility to recover...
2 msg	Why gpg complains?
6 msg	Keyservers mangle with subkey binding sigs

Subject:	Re: new key // sorry, bad sig
Group:	Gnupg-users
From:	vedaal
Date:	24 Jan 2008

Ingo KlÃ¶cker kloecker at kde.org wrote on
Thu Jan 24 21:09:48 CET 2008

> This list doesn't do such a thing.
>Your messages arrived with a good
>signature in my inbox.

yes,
in the e-mailing it is ok

i posted the second one long before the list's digest form of the e-
mail went out, and generally read the posts from the web, not by e-
mail

viewing the first post on the gnupg website:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2008-
January/032439.html

the sig is bad,
and it is because of the protection of the e-mail addresses against
spammers, changing the address form to <vedaal at hush.com>
(btw, a considerate measure,
but one which requires posters to be aware of it when clearsigning
a post that includes an e-mail address)

sorry for the double posting

--
Click here to lower your monthly payments. Act now and save!
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4fRfjQIC4q25BCkBZDfJbugQlAytmgIGy7WJocbRCot o5ckv/
vedaal

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users