2 msgGeneric question: Correct content-type?
5 msgWhere can I buy OpenPGP smartcards?
1 msgGPG Decryption of a PGP encrypted zip file resu...
3 msgfatal: zlib inflate problem: invalid distance code
6 msgIgnoring expiration dates

Social networking
\ Hardeep Singh (31 Dec 2007)
. \ Roscoe (1 Jan 2008)

1 msgOfftopic: Compiling a Windows program for Linux
4 msgpipes cgi and gnupg
1 msgsavety vs. decryption failed: bad key
1 msgnew (2007-12-09) keyanalyze results (+sigcheck)
1 msgPrivacy Handbook down
3 msgManual 1.4.8...
2 msgBZIP2 in 1.4.8
1 msgUnable to Decrypt
3 msgServer problem?
1 msgdokuwiki for gpg
4 msgHas Vista been already included in support OS?
7 msg[Slightly OT] Just to celebrate GnuPG's 10th bi...
2 msgHi to the mailing list
1 msgMac GNU Privacy Guard v1.4.8
Subject:Social networking
Group:Gnupg-users
From:Hardeep Singh
Date:31 Dec 2007


 
Hi All

Current social networking sites have a major problem: anybody can
download your photograph and related details, edit them to his wish,
and repost on the same site.

I would suggest the following: building of, or using an existing WOT
and each person wishing to join the social networking site be asked to
get his profile (photo, name, DOB and some basic details) signed by
three people already in the WOT. Once this is done, a centralised
identity, sign the profile having verified the signatures by the other
three people. Uploads of the photo and profile to any social
networking site would then require a profile signed by the centralised
authority. An exchange of any secret can be done to ensure that the
person uploading the profile is the owner, and the basic details
entered by the uploader verified against those in the profile.

Does this make sense? Is there a way to make this work without the
centralised identity?

Regards
Hardeep

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


© 2004-2008 readlist.com