2 msgSimple beginners questions about the gpg-smartcard
4 msgDetached signature that is not one
7 msgscript to clean my keyring
5 msgbeginner to gnupg

ECC - how does it compare
\ Hardeep Singh (29 Oct 2007)
. \ Robert J. Hansen (29 Oct 2007)
. . \ Remco Post (30 Oct 2007)
. \ Sven Radde (30 Oct 2007)
. . \ Remco Post (30 Oct 2007)
. \ Hardeep Singh (1 Nov 2007)

1 msgsubscribe
1 msgRe: Key safety vs Backup
28 msgKey safety vs Backup : History of a bad day (ke...
2 msgGnuPG 1.4.7 and OS X 10.5
1 msg[Announce] Libgcrypt 1.3.1 released
4 msgMultiple recipients encryption
4 msgFor Mac users: the oncoming Mac OS X 10.5 'Leop...
3 msgPublic/Private Keys - Consequences
1 msggnupg refuses to work on a read-only filesystem
4 msgSeparate Fingerprint for elGamal-Subkey?
1 msgQuestion regarding libgcrypt and openSuse 10.3
3 msgRe: pinentry-mac never displays any UI [seems t...
3 msgQuestion about Replying to List
4 msgTrouble with keyservers
2 msgGnuPG doesn't handle filenames?
Subject:ECC - how does it compare
Group:Gnupg-users
From:Hardeep Singh
Date:29 Oct 2007


 
Hi All

I recently looked at software called 'seccure' which is available for
linux. Its a tool for public key encryption using ECC rather than
prime number factoring.

http://www.nsa.gov/ia/industry/crypto_elliptic_curve.cfm

Here NSA is making a case for ECC.

One advantage that does seem to exist is that there is no need to
persistently store any part of the key - so the threat of someone
meddling with your key on the pen drive seems to be removed.

What do you all think about this? Should we start building an ECC WOT? :-)

Regards
Hardeep Singh

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


© 2004-2008 readlist.com