1 msgnew (2007-03-04) keyanalyze results (+sigcheck)
1 msgArmor...
4 msgArmor bis...
5 msgno-force-v3-sigs
1 msg[Announce] GnuPG 2.0.3 released
1 msgRestore Smart-Card-Manuel
29 msg1.4.7 packages for OS X
3 msg[Announce] Multiple Messages Problem in GnuPG a...
2 msgGnuPG and libksba-1.0.1
2 msgOpenPGP card's RNG
9 msgError with encrypting: unusable public key
1 msgFwd: Zusammenspiel GnuPG - GPG-Relay - sTunnel
7 msgNewbie Q: decryption
5 msgUpdate 1.4.6 Mac OS configure error
2 msgAvailable and default options

Why a subkey?
\ Mike - EMAIL IGNORED (24 Feb 2007)
. \ Robert J. Hansen (24 Feb 2007)
. . \ Sven Radde (26 Feb 2007)
. \ Mike - EMAIL IGNORED (24 Feb 2007)
. \ Mike - EMAIL IGNORED (26 Feb 2007)
. \ Mike - EMAIL IGNORED (27 Feb 2007)
. . \ Robert J. Hansen (27 Feb 2007)
. \ mike.keighley (27 Feb 2007)

2 msgAttribute 'comment'
2 msggnupg 2.0.2 and funopen/fopencookie on Solaris 8
1 msgnew (2007-02-18) keyanalyze results (+sigcheck)
3 msgwalkthrough
Subject:Why a subkey?
Group:Gnupg-users
From:Mike - EMAIL IGNORED
Date:24 Feb 2007


 
On FC4 with gpg 1.4.1:

I created a new user account and used gpg --gen-key .
I selected RSA (sign only) since it was the only RSA
option.

It says the key cannot be used for encryption, and a
subkey must be generated. Why? Is it related to
(sign only)? If so, why was (sign and encrypt)
not offered as an option?

I did this a year or two ago, and I do not remember
needing a subkey. I still have that keyring in
under another user.

Thanks for your help.
Mike.



_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


© 2004-2008 readlist.com