14 msggcc-4.3.0/ppc32 inline assembly produces bad code
2 msgRe: larger default page sizes...
2 msgvalgrind 'uninitialized value' for __cxa_begin_...
2 msgsubreg question
2 msgXDELETEVEC
2 msgABI64 and register save area
9 msgUn-deprecating CRX: Request to review and commit
2 msgCompany Offer
1 msggcc-4.1-20080324 is now available
2 msgGCC : how to add VFPU to PSP Allegrex (MIPS tar...
13 msgRegenerating configure scripts
2 msgGSoC - Multithreaded linker
3 msgProblems with builtin setjmp receiver getting e...
10 msghttp://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ needs ...
2 msggenattrtab segfault on RH 7.3 (powerpc cross)
5 msgARM/Thumb function attribute

MAINTAINERS update (was: [wwwdocs] java/project...
\ Gerald Pfeifer (22 Mar 2008)
. \ Ben Elliston (23 Mar 2008)
. \ Joseph S. Myers (25 Mar 2008)

1 msg[tuples] libgfortran building is broken
16 msgHow to understand gcc source code?
7 msgHow should _Decimal64 and _Decimal128 be aligne...
Subject:MAINTAINERS update (was: [wwwdocs] java/projects.html -- remove broken link)
Group:Gcc
From:Gerald Pfeifer
Date:22 Mar 2008


Anyone knows how to update the following in MAINTAINERS?

libgcj Bryce McKinlay mckinlay

The reason I am asking is that I just got

<mckinlay>: host mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said:
550 5.2.1 <mckinlay>... Mailbox disabled for this recipient
(in reply to RCPT TO command)

I'm wondering how many other entries in our MAINTAINERS file are affected.
Perhaps we ought to send a test message to all and see what comes back?
Thoughts?

Gerald


© 2004-2008 readlist.com