1 msgRe: Patch: delete treelang
2 msgSeg fault in call_gmon_start

C++ FE question: When is CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES...
\ Doug Kwan (關振德) (7 Mar 2008)
. \ Mark Mitchell (20 Mar 2008)
. . \ Doug Kwan (關振德) (20 Mar 2008)

1 msggcc-4.3-20080306 is now available
1 msgSome regression numbers
2 msgGCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-06, 2nd editio...
2 msgInjecting data declarations?
1 msg[tuples] Merged trunk->branch @132948
4 msgGCC 4.3 - Error: Link tests are not allowed aft...
1 msgEnum in namespace
6 msgGCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-03-06)
1 msggcc-4.2-20080305 is now available
2 msgGCC build problem
6 msgRe: [PATCH] Make alias_sets_conflict_p less con...
1 msgSoliciting help upgrading our bugzilla install
2 msgLots of new test failures on trunk due to unrec...
100 msgLinux doesn't follow x86/x86-64 ABI wrt directi...
3 msggcc 3.3.2 Wind River VxWorks PowerPC
4 msg[PATCH] BIT_FIELD_REF_UNSIGNED considered harmful
4 msg[tuples] Branch frozen (again)
Subject:C++ FE question: When is CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES valid?
Group:Gcc
From:Doug Kwan (關振德)
Date:7 Mar 2008


Hi,

I have a question about the validity of CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES.
Due to templates, it is not possible to know if a class has virtual
bases or not until the class is fully instantiated. Is checking
processing_template_decl sufficient to guarantee that
CLASSTYPE_VBASECLASSES is valid?

Thanks.

-Doug


© 2004-2008 readlist.com