Re: PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version)

45 msg	Re: Something is broken in repack
2 msg	$prefix/lib/../$target/sys-include not in <&...
1 msg	gcc-4.1-20071210 is now available
1 msg	Clarification on section variable attribute usa...
1 msg	Alias-analysis in gccint
1 msg	libiberty: make install doesn't install obstack...
3 msg	Using -mlittle-endian or -mbig-endian options....
3 msg	Inserting arbitrary GIMPLE statements & ali...
2 msg	Regarding

Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version
\ Kaveh R. GHAZI (9 Dec 2007)
. \ Richard Guenther (9 Dec 2007)
. . \ Mark Mitchell (10 Dec 2007)
. . . \ Kaveh R. GHAZI (10 Dec 2007)
. . . . \ Mark Mitchell (10 Dec 2007)
. . \ Gabriel Dos Reis (10 Dec 2007)

1 msg	Fwd: Cross compiler build stops
14 msg	Help with another constraint
5 msg	VLIW scheduling and delayed branch
3 msg	The Regents of the University of California BSD...
1 msg	Where was gone?
2 msg	Howto make another convertion with _identifiers...
1 msg	gcc-4.3-20071207 is now available
3 msg	Re: BITS_PER_UNIT less than 8
1 msg	Broken link for Modula-3 front end.
26 msg	libiberty/pex-unix vfork abuse?

Subject:	Re: PATCH: Update MPFR versions (was Re: Revisiting GCC's minimum MPFR version)
Group:	Gcc
From:	Mark Mitchell
Date:	10 Dec 2007

Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:

>>> I would update the recommended version to 2.3.0 and fail for anything less
>>> than 2.2.1.

> Ok, here's my patch. Since we may have some developers still using 2.2.0,
> I'll wait say a week after approval before installing to give them time to
> upgrade.

> Ok for mainline?

OK, under the guidelines you suggest above.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark
(650) 331-3385 x713