Re: Poor pow() / floating point performance of on x86_64

6 msg	Fwd: MetaHTML and the GCC web site
2 msg	C++: operator new and disabled exceptions
3 msg	testsuite for libgomp and so on...
2 msg	GCC 4.2.2 RC2 (finally)
1 msg	context-sensitive keywords, revisited
1 msg	LLVM 2.1 Release
4 msg	Profile information - CFG
4 msg	Question on GGC
4 msg	[libobjc] Shouldn't 'version' take a long?
1 msg	Re: [Bug target/33479] SyncTest Intermittent fa...
3 msg	Require help with the backend in gcc

Re: Poor pow() / floating point performance of ...
\ Ralf LÃ¼bben (26 Sep 2007)
. \ Richard Guenther (26 Sep 2007)
. . \ Tim Prince (26 Sep 2007)

4 msg	$RANLIB not passed to libiberty
5 msg	missing optimization - don't compute return val...
4 msg	support tnat instruction on IA-64. error occurs...
4 msg	Long standing ppc64 regression. Any workarounds?
1 msg	Question about how to have an target specific t...
1 msg	getting operands of call arguments and return v...
6 msg	Q about assignment expansion
1 msg	gcc-4.1-20070924 is now available

Subject:	Re: Poor pow() / floating point performance of on x86_64
Group:	Gcc
From:	Tim Prince
Date:	26 Sep 2007

Richard Guenther wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Ralf Lübben <ralfluebben> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> maybe this is the better list to post the problem (see below).
>>
>
> This is off-topic here, gcc-help would be a more appropriate list.
>
>
True, but it appears to be a glibc problem, rather than one which can be
dealt with in gcc.