RE: [wwwdocs] Patch for RE: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option

3 msg	Newbie questions about gcc / glibc
3 msg	Two quick C++ performace inquiries
4 msg	Signed division with rounding towards -infinity...
72 msg	Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
10 msg	porting problem again: ICE in add_clobbers
1 msg	gcc-4.1-20070917 is now available
9 msg	bootstrap failure on ppc64-linux: ICE in set_va...
9 msg	Ada rts fails to build on ppc64?
4 msg	Online Job Representative Staff
3 msg	Define __NO_MATH_INLINES for x86 -ffast-math?
1 msg	libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled weirdness
2 msg	Should -ftrapv check type conversion?
2 msg	Trap floating-point exceptions?

Coding conventions -- command line option vs co...
\ Gerald Pfeifer (16 Sep 2007)
. \ Dave Korn (17 Sep 2007)
. \ Joseph S. Myers (17 Sep 2007)
. . \ Sandra Loosemore (17 Sep 2007)
. . . \ Gerald Pfeifer (19 Sep 2007)
. . . . \ Dave Korn (20 Sep 2007)

1 msg	Legal Experts Directory
2 msg	Question about rs6000 zero_fp_constant predicate
1 msg	Nvidia PTX backend
1 msg	New GCC ICI (with plug-ins for dynamic pass reo...
1 msg	__if_exists __if_not_exists alternative
1 msg	Haunted Halloween fun at Mountain Village 1890!

Subject:	RE: [wwwdocs] Patch for RE: Coding conventions -- command line option vs command-line option
Group:	Gcc
From:	Dave Korn
Date:	20 Sep 2007

On 19 September 2007 23:31, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

> I am committing the patch below to our coding conventions and will fix
> up the existing web pages accordingly.

Amusingly enough, this just came out today:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7004661.stm

cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....