Re: Bootstrap failure under Irix

1 msg	ARM miscompilation of __moddi3 on trunk
3 msg	warnings in GCC source?
1 msg	Re: Someone has caused regressions in gfortran ...
1 msg	Bootstrap failure under Linux
4 msg	Bootstrap broken: ../../gcc/gcc/ada/trans.c:589...

Bootstrap failure under Irix
\ Philippe Schaffnit (6 Sep 2007)
. \ Janis Johnson (6 Sep 2007)
. \ Philippe Schaffnit (10 Sep 2007)

7 msg	[RFC] missing return warnings
1 msg	Bootstrap broken at stage1
2 msg	VM/Back-end
10 msg	Register allocation issues
1 msg	gcc-4.2-20070905 is now available
1 msg	question about comment buglet
12 msg	Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-solaris2.10
49 msg	GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-09-04)
10 msg	GCC 4.2.2 Status Report
15 msg	Someone has caused regressions in gfortran
1 msg	Re: bootstrap failing on ppc linux (fixed)
1 msg	GLIBCXX_ dependency
2 msg	bootstrap failing on ppc linux
2 msg	IA64 optimizations..

Subject:	Re: Bootstrap failure under Irix
Group:	Gcc
From:	Philippe Schaffnit
Date:	10 Sep 2007

Hi!

Sorry for taking so long, but bootstarping really takes forever under
SGI (especially as I wasn't getting that much CPU time): I was able to
build '128233' sources (see hereafter).

Thanks a lot!

Philippe

PS: the output of check:

=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes 44115
# of unexpected failures 43
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 88
# of unresolved testcases 17
# of untested testcases 35
# of unsupported tests 341
/USER/philippe/Irix/Compilation/Gcc/gcc/xgcc version 4.3.0 20070907
(experimental) [trunk revision 128233] (GCC)

Janis Johnson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 09:47 +0200, Philippe Schaffnit wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I am seeing the folowing bootstrap failure under SGI Irix:
>
> > /USER/philippe/Irix/Gcc_Sources/gcc/config/mips/mips.md: In function
> > 'gen_fixuns_truncdfsi2':
> > /USER/philippe/Irix/Gcc_Sources/gcc/config/mips/mips.md:2808: error: too
> > few arguments to function 'real_2expN'
>
> > My last attempt at wa succesful with : '4.3.0 20070823 (experimental)
> > [trunk revision 127728]' (I haven't tried in between). Can anyone
> > suggest anything?
>
> I broke this, and reverted the patch (and two other patches that cleaned
> up after it) in r128193.
>
> Janis