Re: Announce: VCG support for Graph::Easy

1 msg	PATCH: PR ld/4918: ___tls_get_addr call require...
3 msg	RFD: Unwind_Backtrace for ARM EABI
4 msg	gcc on SCO
1 msg	gcc-4.1-20070813 is now available
3 msg	Post constructor/Pre destructor hooks
1 msg	MPFR 2.3.0 Release Candidate 2
1 msg	Why does __tls_get_addr call require @PLT for g...
2 msg	Za 24 sata mozete imati svoju Internet prezenta...
3 msg	When does this page update ?

Announce: VCG support for Graph::Easy
\ Tels (12 Aug 2007)
. \ Tels (15 Aug 2007)
. . \ Jan-Benedict Glaw (15 Aug 2007)
. . . \ Tels (15 Aug 2007)

2 msg	Sign extension by expr.c convert_move()
3 msg	ipa for fortran question
19 msg	RFC: Simplify rules for ctz/clz patterns and RTL
1 msg	gcc-4.3-20070810 is now available
5 msg	reload question
3 msg	Re: Very Fast: Directly Coded Lexical Analyzer
7 msg	GCC 'make' errors
2 msg	Results for 4.2.1 testsuite on sparc-sun-solari...
11 msg	GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-08-09)
3 msg	Your Gmail account, djangoporter, has been created

Subject:	Re: Announce: VCG support for Graph::Easy
Group:	Gcc
From:	Tels
Date:	15 Aug 2007

Moin,

On Wednesday 15 August 2007 21:30:16 Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-08-12 23:45:09 +0200, Tels <nospam-abuse>
wrote:
> > The signature on my email was bad/broken, when it came back to me from
> > the mailing-list. Did this happen to anybody else?
> >
> > Since this never happened to me before, here is another email, as test.
> > Let's see if the signature is still bad (e.g. the list garbles my text
> > somehow).
>
> This unfortunately happens regularly on this list. I don't think if
> this is considered a problem or only annoying.

It happened to my second mail, too, and lazy inspection shows that probably
just some lines are wrapped. Still, very annoying as it breaks my
signatures and I consider it a problem.

(Of course, apart from this announcement, I don't intent to post much on
this list, except maybe if someone asks me a VCG related question.)

> What actually *is* a problem is that you're most probably using a
> non-working "From: " header. Or do you actually read nospam-abuse?

Of course. Why should I not read it?

All the best,

Tels

--
Signed on Wed Aug 15 22:02:13 2007 with key 0x93B84C15.
View my photo gallery: http://bloodgate.com/photos
PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.

"We have problems like this all of the time," Kirk said, trying to
reassure me. "Sometimes its really hard to get things burning."

-- http://tinyurl.com/qmg5