Re: need help with builtin function prototypes

3 msg	cfg representation

need help with builtin function prototypes
\ DJ Delorie (9 Aug 2007)
. \ Ian Lance Taylor (9 Aug 2007)
. . \ DJ Delorie (9 Aug 2007)
. \ Kaveh R. GHAZI (10 Aug 2007)
. . \ DJ Delorie (10 Aug 2007)

7 msg	mips gcc -O1: Address exception error on store ...
2 msg	can't bootstrap current trunk on cygwin: tree.c...
3 msg	can't bootstrap current trunk: internal compile...
2 msg	Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-linux-gnu
1 msg	bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
1 msg	Zdenek Dvorak appointed loop infrastructure mai...
4 msg	Fixed function compilation order
2 msg	x86_64 ABI
1 msg	[tuples] gimplification of other FEs and platforms
22 msg	[RFC] Migrate pointers to members to the middle...
10 msg	Bootstrap failed on i386-pc-solaris2.10
2 msg	Speedup area - Strings/Identifiers
3 msg	AltiVec stack boundary
2 msg	What 64-bit CPU targets dominate in the future?
1 msg	Question about PR tree-optimization/32941, boot...
1 msg	gcc-4.1-20070806 is now available
5 msg	GCC Testsuite question (C checks in Fortran suite)
2 msg	x64_64-elf support

Subject:	Re: need help with builtin function prototypes
Group:	Gcc
From:	DJ Delorie
Date:	10 Aug 2007

> I don't know about using reference types, but there are several math
> builtins that "return" multiple values, the extra ones via pointer
> arguments. E.g. see frexp, lgamma_r, modf, remquo and/or sincos.

Like I said, I'm kinda locked into the syntax. People have been using
these builtins for many years now. Everything was fine when we
expanded the builtins to insns before optimization, and we could block
optimizations using RTL, but we don't have that option with tree
optimizations.