Re: GCC Testsuite question (C checks in Fortran suite)

3 msg	cfg representation
5 msg	need help with builtin function prototypes
7 msg	mips gcc -O1: Address exception error on store ...
2 msg	can't bootstrap current trunk on cygwin: tree.c...
3 msg	can't bootstrap current trunk: internal compile...
2 msg	Bootstrap failure on i386-pc-linux-gnu
1 msg	bootstrap failure on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
1 msg	Zdenek Dvorak appointed loop infrastructure mai...
4 msg	Fixed function compilation order
2 msg	x86_64 ABI
1 msg	[tuples] gimplification of other FEs and platforms
22 msg	[RFC] Migrate pointers to members to the middle...
10 msg	Bootstrap failed on i386-pc-solaris2.10
2 msg	Speedup area - Strings/Identifiers
3 msg	AltiVec stack boundary
2 msg	What 64-bit CPU targets dominate in the future?
1 msg	Question about PR tree-optimization/32941, boot...
1 msg	gcc-4.1-20070806 is now available

GCC Testsuite question (C checks in Fortran suite)
\ Steve Ellcey (6 Aug 2007)
. \ Janis Johnson (6 Aug 2007)
. . \ Steve Ellcey (6 Aug 2007)
. . . \ Janis Johnson (6 Aug 2007)
. . . . \ Steve Ellcey (6 Aug 2007)

2 msg	x64_64-elf support

Subject:	Re: GCC Testsuite question (C checks in Fortran suite)
Group:	Gcc
From:	Steve Ellcey
Date:	6 Aug 2007

> Yes. I tried it in the order your used, and the compile to check
> for inttypes.h tried to also compile c_kinds.c, which wasn't
> available from where the compile was done. In general it's best
> to check effective targets before adding files or options, unless
> the options are required for the effective-target check.
>
> Janis

Thanks, I'll change the order and see how things look in tonight's
testing. Assuming it goes well I'll send an official patch tomorrow.

Steve Ellcey
sje