10 msgflag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
2 msgHelp on emitting static constant arrays
2 msgGCC 4.2.1 RC1
25 msgAbout the is_gimple_min_invariant predicate
8 msgDecimal float and the Cygwin build of GFortran.
1 msgGCC 4.2.1 Status Report (2007-07-03)
1 msgHow should gcc handle '-shared -pie' and '-pie ...
3 msgQuestion regarding getting .rodata into the .da...
2 msg[patch] conditionally declare bswap functions d...

bootstrap broken on powerpc?
\ Dorit Nuzman (3 Jul 2007)
. \ Revital1 Eres (5 Jul 2007)
. \ Dorit Nuzman (5 Jul 2007)
. . \ Steve Kargl (5 Jul 2007)
. . . \ Dorit Nuzman (5 Jul 2007)
. . . . \ Dorit Nuzman (5 Jul 2007)
. . . . . \ Steve Kargl (5 Jul 2007)

5 msgautoconf 2.61 on debian etch and GCC
2 msg4.3 x86_64 Bootstrap breaks
2 msgMPFR 2.3.0 Release Candidate
1 msgFYI: today's regressions in libstdc++
1 msggcc-4.1-20070702 is now available
2 msgFwd: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays...
7 msg[GSoC: DDG export][RFC] Current status
8 msgWow!
89 msgno_new_pseudos
1 msgIs it still true that message-lenght == 72 for ...
Subject:Re: bootstrap broken on powerpc?
Group:Gcc
From:Steve Kargl
Date:5 Jul 2007


On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 07:36:24PM +0300, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
>> Steve Kargl <sgk> wrote on 05/07/2007
>> 17:46:45:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 12:48:38PM +0300, Dorit Nuzman wrote:
>>>> Revital1 Eres/Haifa/IBM wrote on 05/07/2007 12:12:40:
>>>>
>>>>>> checking whether the GNU Fortran compiler is working... no
>>>>>> configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working; please report a bug in
>>>>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla, attaching
>>>>>> /Develop/mainline-dn/build3/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/\
>>>>>> libgfortran/config.log
>>>>>> make[1]: *** [configure-target-libgfortran] Error 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone else seeing this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I get the same error with r126353.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It passsed with r126184, and fails since r126185:
>>>> r126185 | kargl | 2007-07-02 05:47:21 +0300 (Mon, 02 Jul 2007) | 281lines
>>>>
>>>> I can currently pass bootstrap only w/o fortran.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you have revision 126369?
>>>
>>
>> I'll give it a try
>>
>
> still fails
>

We'll need more information than the above because this
is the only platform that shows this error and I don't
have access to this platform.

--
Steve


© 2004-2008 readlist.com