Re: Type system functions to their own file?

3 msg	FAIL: gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-5.c on gcc-4.2 b...
3 msg	libjava is broken
1 msg	gcc-4.2-20070620 is now available
4 msg	[tuples] Accessors for RHS of assignments

Type system functions to their own file?
\ Giovanni Bajo (20 Jun 2007)
. \ Richard Guenther (20 Jun 2007)

8 msg	[PATCH][RFC] Re-structure tree_ssa_useless_type...
13 msg	How to supress a specific kind of ansi-aliasing...
5 msg	libgcc fails to compile if DItype is not suppor...
3 msg	preventing -m options being passed to the compiler
22 msg	Type-punning
2 msg	class 3 edges
1 msg	scalar expansion and array privatization for lo...
3 msg	Where can I find 'sizeof' implementation in fro...
10 msg	Severe increase in compilation time with 4.3.0 ...
27 msg	m68k bootstrap problem
2 msg	cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o testcase
1 msg	run-time function adaptation for statically-com...
5 msg	Object attribute tagging
9 msg	virtual stack regs.
1 msg	gcc-4.1-20070618 is now available

Subject:	Re: Type system functions to their own file?
Group:	Gcc
From:	Richard Guenther
Date:	20 Jun 2007

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Giovanni Bajo wrote:

> Hi Richard,
>
> what about moving all the type-system related functions to a new file, eg:
> tree-ssa-type.c? I think that makes the intent even clearer.

While this is surely a good idea I'd like to do this separately to not
make diffs unnecessarily larger. Also it is not yet clear where to
draw the line ;)

Richard.