1 msgThe Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.17 is released
2 msgFwd: INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX in ia64.h
3 msgNew LTO branch ready
1 msgRequesting SVN write access (Was: [PATCH frv] F...
3 msgmissing symbols
1 msggcov / gcov-dump
5 msg[M16C] : 20 bit data access
10 msgSuffix for __float128 FP constants
21 msgActivate -mrecip with -ffast-math?

More vectorizer testcases?
\ Giovanni Bajo (17 Jun 2007)
. \ Dorit Nuzman (18 Jun 2007)
. . \ Giovanni Bajo (18 Jun 2007)
. . . \ Dorit Nuzman (18 Jun 2007)

3 msginit-regs pass initializes virtual-stack-vars?
2 msgStatus of simulator targets after dataflow merge
3 msgPR other/32351 [Was: Re: GCC Status Report (200...
5 msgFixing m68hc11 reorg after dataflow merge
24 msgPTR-PLUS merge into the mainline
4 msgWhen EOL? Replacing GCJ by IcedTea, GCC by LLVM.
73 msgI'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union memb...
1 msggcc-4.3-20070615 is now available
11 msgGCC Status Report (2007-06-15)
4 msgAccess to raw repositories
Subject:More vectorizer testcases?
Group:Gcc
From:Giovanni Bajo
Date:17 Jun 2007


Hi Dorit,

some years ago I posted these testcases to Bugzilla's GCC:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18437
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18438
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18439

It looks like none of those are vectorized as of GCC 4.3. I read today that
you're asking for more vectorizer testsuite so I was wondering:

1) Shall we add a GCC bugzilla component for the vectorizer? Currently the
bugs are filed under "tree-optimization" which might be a little too generic,
these days.

2) Do you need more testcases from geometric code like those above? Those 3
above are pretty simple in fact, so I doubt more complex ones can be of help,
but I can extract something more from my code if you want...
--
Giovanni Bajo



© 2004-2008 readlist.com